Talk:Lucent Public License

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is great and all, but merely copy-pasting the text of a public liscense doesn't make it encyclopedic. Some actual encyclopedic information needs to be added to this article. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs) 10:04, 17 July 2005 (UTC)}

This article was nominated for deletion on October 19, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

— JIP | Talk 05:54, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

The Article states that the licence is not competable with the GPL, and its not free software, the plan9 article on the contrast, states that this is OS and FS!!--Mayz 12:12, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

This article is serioudly confused and mixes the LPL with a very old license an old release of Plan 9 was done under, I have removed the incorrent references and comments, but I agree this article should probably die as the Plan 9 article already covers this Lost Goblin 02:09, 12 December 2005 (UTC)