Talk:LSWR 415 class

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article LSWR 415 class has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
July 16, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
Trains Portal
Sel week 40, 2007
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.
Mid Importance: mid within UK Railways WikiProject.
This article is within the scope of the Locomotives task force.


To-do
list

Pending tasks for LSWR 415 class:

 (purge cache –  edit this list)

References Metric measurements--Bulleid Pacific 11:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Todo

[edit] GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:


Again, I made a few simple edits to ensure that (a) the article complied with the majority of WP:MOS (e.g. section headings, citation positions and the use of the en-dash) and (b) remained neutral in tone. My only reservation is the shortage of different reliable sources, but this is a niche article, so having then re-reviewed the article, I'm promoting to GA. The Rambling Man 12:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)