User talk:LRBurdak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vinay Jha 15:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Click here to leave a new message.

Welcome! स्वागतम्! ॐ शान्ति ! शान्ति !! शान्ति !!!

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Archives
Jan 2005 – Dec 2005 Jan 2006 – Jun 2006 Jul 2006 – Dec 2006 Jan 2007 – Jun 2007

1 Tourism in Madhya Pradesh
2 Re : Jat Page
3 Do not delete content from Jat people
4 Itihaaskar
5 G.D. KUMAR
6 Shekhsar
7 Attribution to Jatland
8 Dhetarwal
9 Citations needed in History of Rajasthan
10 Editing if nagvansh
11 Why I moved the image of the so-called "Indian Bison"
12 Image:Parasram Maderna.gif listed for deletion
13 Notability of Karvir (clan)
14 Keep
15 Question?
16 Chaudhary surname
17 Burdak question?? Hansarah Jat gotra information?
18 Gotra Hansarah
19 Image source problem with Image:Justice Mahavir singh.jpg
20 Image source problem with Image:Swami Omanand.jpg
21 Image source problem with Image:Kumbharam Arya1.jpg
22 Image source problem with Image:Devilal.jpg
23 {{GFDL-self}} tag
24 Bhobia
25 Re: Bhobia
26 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:288baladitya-and-yashodharma.jpg
27 Kanswa
28 Re : Kanswa

[edit] Tourism in Madhya Pradesh

I noticed that recently you added a section to Tourism in India called Tourism in Madhya Pradesh. I thought that there was enough information there for an entire article, so I used your input for that section to creat another article by the name of Tourism in Madhya Pradesh. I did have to reformat the article a bit to make it a little easier to read, I also did some research and used some of the best images that I could find to add to the article. After I created the new article using your information I reduced what was in the section for Madhya Pradesh in the Tourism in India article. I have acually made three new articles using the infomation from that one article. Also Tourism in Maharashtra, and Tourism in Andhra Pradesh. Check it out. جميع أفراد المجتمع المؤهلين مدعوون للتصويت في انتخابات مجلس أمناء مؤسسة ويكيميديا.

Hi Mindys12345 ! Thanks for creating separate page for Tourism in Madhya Pradesh. It is nice. We are planning to expand it. --burdak 04:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks, I am glad you like it. User:Mindys12345 aka جميع أفراد المجتمع المؤهلين مدعوون للتصويت في انتخابات مجلس أمناء مؤسسة ويكيميديا.

Excellent work, added them to Wikipedia:Notice board for India-related topics/It's new. utcursch | talk 11:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou, always happy to help out. Mindys12345 এই সভ্যজন অসমৰجميع أفراد المجتمع . .

Hi. Yes I would like to have a look, I am just about to retire for the night so I will probably get stuck in sometime tommorrow. Thanks Mindys12345स्वागतम्! ॐ शान्ति ! शान्ति !! शान्ति !!!

I had a look at Tribals in Madhya Pradesh, the format for that article seems to be fine. The other article might need a bit. I'll try to think of something, I have an Idea but that might make the article to long. I'll get back to you later with some ideas if poss. Thanks Mindys12345स्वागतम्! ॐ शान्ति ! शान्ति !! शान्ति !!! 05:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re : Jat Page

Please stop removing the tags of the Jat page without discussion. This makes us Jatts look like we cannot discuss issues in a rational manner. Also these tags have now been removed several times so I will be left with no option but to report this matter if this continues and the page may be locked. Thanks --Sikh-history 11:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC) DS Dhaliwal.

There is already a dispute tag on the header seems not necessary to put more dispute tags on each section. There is limit of period for such tags and if dispute is not resolved these can be removed. There seems not much of contribution to this page from your side. By the way whom do you expect to resolve these tags and within what period? burdak 16:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Have you read the yahoo groups link?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JatHistory/message/4526

It is made very clear in that link chandragupta is not gutta and hence not jatta/jat/jutta. Calling Chandragupta a jat is just a figment of imagination of some and nothing else. Please stop vandalising this page with your bias.

Itihaaskar 20:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

I request you to stop vandalising the jat page. Itihaaskar 19:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

We need some impartial anthropological evidence. We need to seperate what is religious history (in my case Sikh but also Hindu), and what is Jatt history. We need ISBN numbers for ALL refrences. Till then we will not be taken seriously and we will be attacked.--Sikh-history 18:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Do not delete content from Jat people

You have been warned but still deleting content from Jat people and vandalizing it, which is your only contribution to Wikipedia. If you have something discuss. You are again and again writing only one line that Chandragupta is not Jat. It is not sufficient to prove any thing. So please come forward with any substantial proof. Don't delete content from Jat people without discussion !!! --burdak 15:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

You cannot spread lies. Have you read this?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JatHistory/message/4526

Itihaaskar 17:12, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Ithihaaskar

You must also quote the rest of the discussion, to the above message.

Ravi Chaudhary 19:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

It is a figment of imagination to associate Chandragupts Maurya with Jats. He belonged to the Mauria/Muria clan, and that is why Peacock was a taboo for Mauryas. Jats have no association with Mauriya/Muria/Maurya (cf. Romila Thapar's 'Asoka and the decline of the MAuryas'). But Itihaaskar should not delete others' views, Itihaaskar should add his own version. --Vinay Jha 15:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Itihaaskar

If you have any reason to believe that User:Itihaaskar is a sockpuppet, please file a Request for Checkuser. The best way to solve a content dispute is filing a Request for Comment. utcursch | talk 07:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] G.D. KUMAR

Dear Burdak, Early this year you thought of looking for Kumar's portrait. Any hope of finding one ? All the best.--BobClive 05:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shekhsar

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shekhsar, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jatland.com/home/Godara. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 04:46, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Attribution to Jatland

Jatland has been Attributed that The original text of this article was taken from http://www.jatland.com/home/Godara, and http://www.jatland.com/home/Shekhsar, which is licensed under the GFDL. Hence no copyright violation. --burdak 05:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Would you please let me know, why you people are interested in not keeping the p c chandawat wiki page. Is it not maintaining the WIKI rules regulations ? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrimali (talk • contribs) 14:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dhetarwal

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dhetarwal, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jatland.com/home/Dhetarwal. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

Attribution - The original text of this article was taken from http://www.jatland.com/home/Dhetarwal, which is licensed under the GFDL. --burdak 03:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Citations needed in History of Rajasthan

The article mentions in ancient history section about kingdoms of Rajputs in 6th century. The term Rajput was invented about 7th century AD. It seems speculation. Thakur Deshraj is one of the prominent Historian. He has mentioned about Rajputs in his book on Jat history page 113-114, The Gazetteer of India Vol 2 (page 307-308), Which deals with the Rajputs writes as under:

"Then between the 7th and 8th centuries the old racial divisions passed away and a new division came in founded upon status and function.... The rise of Rajputs determined the whole political history of time. They made their first appearance in 8-9th centuries; most of the greatest clans took possession of their seats between 800 and 850 AD. ..."

In view of these facts the ancient history of Rajasthan needs revision. If the contributirs feel they have facts they may provide in the article. So I have put citation tags. --burdak 04:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Editing if nagvansh

Why I should stop from deleting some material?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.163.192.85 (talk) 09:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Why I moved the image of the so-called "Indian Bison"

It seems that Mr. Burdak has not read the article on bison from which I moved the image before he saw fit to (wrongly) criticise me again. The article on Bison very clearly says: "Bison is a taxonomic group containing six species of large even-toed ungulates within the subfamily Bovinae. Only two of these species still exist: the American Bison (B. bison) and the European Bison, or wisent (B. bonasus)."

In fact the article on Bison states very clearly: "The gaur, a large, thick-coated ox found in Asia, is also known as the Indian Bison, although it is in the genus Bos and thus not a true bison."

This means that, even though the Gaur is sometimes referred to as the "Indian Bison" - this is an incorrect naming (rather like the American Bison being called a Buffalo - which it is not). So, it should not be pictured on the bison page.

I will, therefore, move this image once again - to its proper place in the article on the Gaur (Bos gaurus). John Hill 04:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Parasram Maderna.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Parasram Maderna.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 19:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Karvir (clan)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Karvir (clan), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Karvir (clan) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Karvir (clan), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 18:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Keep

Karvir is one of ancient clans of hostorical importance. The article is in offing and will slowly develope. If deleted we will loose info about ancient Iranian clan which spread up to India. It is requested to keep it. burdak 12:45, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question?

Burdak is it correct that some Muslim Jat people in Pakistan use the surname Chaudhary, if this is correct it MUST be listed as one of the Jat clans names and please also do an article on it- thanks.--Jat78 (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chaudhary surname

It is correct that many Muslim Jat people in Pakistan use the surname Chaudhary. Also in India. It is based on title. Article is already there in Wikipedia. We need to expand it. We will do it very soon. Thanks. burdak (talk) 16:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Burdak question?? Hansarah Jat gotra information?

Dear Burdak, can you tell me if Hansarah is a Jat gotra and where they are from in India and their history. I need this because a friend is considering marriage into this gotra, friend needs to know EVERYTHING about this gotra. Please can you give me a lot of information about the Hansarah gotra?--Jat78 (talk) 18:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gotra Hansarah

I do not find exactly Hansarah gotra in literature available with me. I give some links which may have probable linkages. Hans, Hansawat, Hanselia. burdak (talk) 16:23, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Justice Mahavir singh.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Justice Mahavir singh.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 19:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Swami Omanand.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Swami Omanand.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Kumbharam Arya1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kumbharam Arya1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Devilal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Devilal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

[edit] {{GFDL-self}} tag

Thanks Angr for reminding me. I had created these images and now put the {{GFDL-self}} tag. --burdak (talk) 11:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bhobia

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bhobia, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jatland.com/home/Bhobia. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

[edit] Re: Bhobia

Article takes contents from Jatland Wiki, which is licensed under GFDL, There is due attribution recorded as under:

Attribution - The original text of this article is taken from http://www.jatland.com/home/Bhaubhia, which is licensed under GFDL

Hence article Bhobia may not be deleted. These is no copyright violation. burdak (talk) 07:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:288baladitya-and-yashodharma.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:288baladitya-and-yashodharma.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kanswa

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kanswa, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jatland.com/home/Kanswa. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

[edit] Re : Kanswa

This stub takes contents from Jatland Wiki, which is licensed under GFDL, There is due attribution recorded as under:

Attribution - The original text of this article is taken from http://www.jatland.com/home/Kanswa, which is licensed under GFDL. These is no copyrighted content and hence no violation of copyright.Hence article Kanswa may not be deleted. burdak (talk) 04:05, 21 April 2008 (UTC)