User talk:Lpimlott
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
work in progress:
please bear with me if there are any goofs :) this is my first Wikipedia article.--Lpimlott 04:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] fair use
do a search on fair-use rationale for promotional images. there is a template with instructions on how to fill it out. Tmaull 14:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:8500.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:8500.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 11:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use for DT466 image
Thanks very much for putting the rationale up for the DT466 image! Sincerely, Nick L. 05:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:8500_dash.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:8500_dash.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 21:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:4300ems_small.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:4300ems_small.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 21:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:8500.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:8500.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 21:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Tractors.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tractors.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 21:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Rafttruck2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rafttruck2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 21:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:4000_interior.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:4000_interior.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 21:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:4000family.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:4000family.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 21:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image Deletion
Yeah. It happens. A good number of images I upload get taken down for no good reason, even after they have completed templates etc. Its just part of the process I guess. Tmaull (talk) 23:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your images
Just wanted to comment on my edits to those images - I was noting for the template that a rationale existed but was not making any judgment on the appropriateness of the rationale. Just having a rationale isn't good enough for an image to be kept on Wikipedia, it must be a correct and usable rationale. Those images should be replaced with free images - just because you don't have access to the vehicles and aren't able to take the images yourself doesn't mean that someone can't, and that's the criteria fair-use is held against. Imagine it this way - the only reason fair-use is allowable if there is no way in heaven or earth to get a free picture. If there is a way, no matter how remote, then fair-use is not an option. Shell babelfish 12:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
