User talk:LPagliaro
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] List of Newsletters
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article List of Newsletters, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ... discospinster talk 20:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Since you asked for details, the page is at present entirely devoted to listing a few financial newsletters from one particular company. A list of newsletters would have sections for the dozens of major types from different industries and other organizations, and most of them would be notable enough to have their own WP articles. There would be considerable resistance to adding individual article of publications of this type, unless it would be possible to show really good reliable references about the notability of the newsletter. This at present looks like an attempt to get additional entries for relatively minor publications. What I suggest you do that is related to your interests, is to write an article on Institutional Investor magazine (or magazines--I am not sure of the precise relationship in content between the International/Americas/Alpha editions, and I'd like to know. As I understand it, they are standard publications, frequently cited in Wikipedia articles. I'd keep it at a single article, and I would strongly suggest you develop it offline before putting it in here, & that you'd include some solid data on circulation and so on, but make it sound completely unlike anything that might be sent out as PR or advertising. Good luck with it. DGG 03:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of List of Newsletters
I've nominated List of Newsletters, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that List of Newsletters satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Newsletters and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of Newsletters during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 20:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Compliance Reporter Logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Compliance Reporter Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 05:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Private Asset Management
A tag has been placed on Private Asset Management, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
- If you continue to post articles which are nothing more than advertising your company's newsletters, you will be blocked from editing on Wikipedia. Realkyhick 18:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Operations Management Newsletter
A tag has been placed on Operations Management Newsletter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.WhaleyTim 16:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
