User talk:Lova Falk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to post messages here!

Contents

[edit] Thank you

Just a quick note to show my appreciation for your recent vandal fighting, in particular reverting the blanking of my talk page. Cheers. Adambro 17:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome! :) Lova Falk 19:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good Job!

Great work you're doing on the article aphasia. If possible would you be able to do add (a sentence or so) something about paraphasia into aphasia... as i belive aphasia is a major group- and paraphasia is like a sub group. That is if it's appropriate. Would add it myself but I don't know much about both conditions (apart from the basics about paraphasia) so yeah, if u can that would be great :).

Keep up the great work! Cya. petze 14:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your encouragement! However, paraphasia is not in itself considered a subtype of aphasia, but a symptom that can occur in different subtypes of aphasia. Patients with Wernicke's aphasia, Transcortical sensory aphasia, Conduction aphasia, Anomic aphasia and Broca's aphasia can suffer from paraphasia. Cheers! :) Lova Falk 15:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Love

Oops! I guess it was a "Freudian" slip. ( hehe, get it?) :p It's been corrected and expanded. I really did (still do) appreciate your kindness when you reached out to me. Thank you. Hope all is well with you and your lovely family. :) For some time, I thought there was a bunch of malfunctioning robots with funny names (created by children as a school project) running Wikipedia, and out to piss me off for the fun of it. lol That is -- until... I realized, we are all real people behind the screen, and most of us have the best intentions. (Oh, I fancied up my user ID, so you may not recognise me, Jeeny) Jeannie * 18:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Of course I recognize you! Did you notice that I sent you a mail last monday? I don't want you to feel obliged to answer, but it occurred to me that you might not have got it.
Yes, most of all have the best intentions. And actually, quite a few vandalists say "hi Nick", or "I love Stacey" and puerile as that may be, there's not much harm in that either. Cute user ID! Lova Falk 19:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, I'll have to check on the mail. Yahoo did something to their software, or something (an upgrade, I think) and it logged me out, and I couldn't logged back in for a time because it didn't "recognize" me. (Oh, I changed my "cute" user ID, because I'm too old to be cute. Well, at least, as an online signature on Wikipee. :) Plus, it seems like I changed my identity (and feels strange, to me), even though that's my real first name. lol Let's see how this looks now. Jeenytalk 19:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
I know what you mean - I'm fond of "Lova" and would not change it for my real name. Don't be bothered by cute though - you know, non-native speakers like me can use all kinds of sophisticated words but it's hard for us to know connotations of words like cute.
By the way, it's night in Sweden and I'm about to turn off my computer. Ciao! Lova Falk 20:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Goodnight, Lova. "Cute" was the correct term. I thought of it as such before you even commented on it, but still too "cute" for my age (and uncomfortable to use). G'nite. - Jeeny (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IP edits

Regarding your question at WP:NCH. There's been a vandalism study which was recently discussed in the Wikipedia Signpost. I can't remember the results, but I think it showed things were less problematic than they were made out to be. I could be wrong, though. If you're interested in the details of anon editing, I suggest you go through the signpost archives and dig it up. - Mgm|(talk) 09:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! Good idea. Lova Falk 18:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] a friend

Hi,

i have a friend who like you was born in the Netherlands and, like you, nowadays lives in Sweden. He is also interested in ADHD. This is his web page:

http://www.dennisrodie.com/page7.html

Hope you will find it interesting.

—Cesar Tort 02:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, that's very friendly of you! Lova Falk 08:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk to myself

[edit] Some ideas on the page weak central coherence

Hi,

i started a discussion on the page about weak central coherence. Could you please have a look at the discussion page, and say what you think about it?

greets 157.193.108.159 11:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your invitation! I will certainly have a look and say what I think, but not tonight though. Lova Falk 17:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] thanks

Thank you for taking the time to improve Wikipedia articles using information that is mentioned at the reference desk. I made a citation to a physiology textbook that I like. I spend most of my wiki editing time at Wikiversity these days, so I do not get to help as much as I should at Wikipedia. :( --JWSchmidt 20:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

It's me who should be thanking you! The whole thing starts with me being confused and asking for help at the reference desk. When I get the picture, it's fun to add my newly gained understanding to an article. Lova Falk 21:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] pictures

thanks for sharing your collection of neuropsychology pictures...MisterSheik (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Invite

Century Tower

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! ~~~~


[edit] synaptic transmission

i expanded your article becouse you didnt really tutch what i would concider some of the vital points on the subject, but i didnt do much, im just giving you a heads up so you could look over the more, in depth, user friendly description i put in, and make adjusments if you think there needed. Roy Stanley (talk) 18:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] RfC on article on Intelligence

Wikipedian psychologists are invited to comment on the worthiness of a source on this request for comment. Ward3001 (talk) 21:33, 25 March 2008 (UTC)