Talk:Lovewrecked

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B
This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Low
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
This article is within the scope of the Comedy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to comedy, comics, comedians, comedy movies, and the like. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Lovewrecked was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Reviewed version: March 15, 2008


[edit] GA observation

I'm not reviewing the article, but you are going to want to format all the citations using the Template:Cite web before it has a chance of passing. Nikki311 02:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I am reviewing this article and unfortunately, I am failing it. Good job on writing a decent article on a TV/straight-to-DVD movie that is stable and factually accurate, but imporvements are required for a promotion in quality.
  • The references need to list authors when possible.
  • I removed the taglines per Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines#Tagline.
  • The plot section reads like a back cover or product description on a company website; I have suspicions that it was even copied from another website (excuse me if they copied it from here).
  • The budget and "the film was shortened as Randal Kleiser wanted to target the film toward more family audiences than teenager audiences" need citations.
  • The reception section is only four sentences long. There are at least four more reviews over at Rotten Tomatoes. Say why critics did not like this movie, instead of just saying that they did not like it.
The following are not necessary for GA:
  • It would be nice to have short desciptions for all characters.
  • The production section is very short, although I am unsure if you will be able to find any more information on this film.
  • A free picture of Amanda Bynes would be nice.
  • Mentioning who director Randal Kleiser and producer Lance Bass are would be interesting.
I apologize that no one reviewed this sooner. Thanks, –thedemonhog talkedits 18:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)