Talk:Love Is...
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] reword
- however, no anatomical features are included
Arms, legs and noses are anatomical features! Can we find a better wording? The Wednesday Island 02:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- They are "anatomically incorrect"? --22:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Child Pornography
How can people let it go on? Two naked eight year olds? Is this any better than Hentai?
-G
- Yeah, I think the article definitely needs to mention that the characters look like toddlers. I added a few lines about it. I wonder if there should be a "Controversy" section. Lcduke 00:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] CHILD PORN, HRADLY!!!
You people have nothing better to do, you take something so innocent and pure and change into child porn! that's preposterous, get a life!
- Innocent and pure, eh? Hradly. Have you noticed that the artist's brothers are the designers of first-person shooter computer games? Have a look at the family pictures. There's no way that smirking Gen-X geek doesn't know the connotations of his work. Lcduke 19:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Erm.. I think their mom started making these as love notes in like 1960... I HIGHLY doubt that she meant for it to be pornography. --BiT 22:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Move to Love is...
I don't understand why it's "is" is capitalized? Look at the picture, it sais Love is... not Love Is... Dose anyone mind if I move it? --Steinninn talk 17:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Well, the page Death Note has both words capitalized. I think the rule is that in headers you capitalize every word that isn't an adposition? --BiT 22:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- No sorry, every word that isn't conjunction.. Don't quote me on that one though. --BiT 22:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Not for Wiktionary
Thanks, but titles of comic strips don't meet wikt:WT:CFI. The translations we have at e.g. wikt:I love you#Translations, cover this anyhow. --Connel MacKenzie - wikt 09:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
