Talk:Lovćen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Source?
This article is written more in a tourist guide kind of style and indeed I found it at Mount Lovcen. The site says Copyright (c) National Tourism Organisation of Montenegro. Do we have their permission to use it under GFDL? --Romanm 07:31, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
It is governmental website. They don`t have right to put copyright for the information. It is about webdesign.--[[User:Avala|Avala|★]] 10:14, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Actually, the national tourism organization doesn't have to be a government agency, it could be a state-owned enterprise, in which case it can hold copyright. In any event, the generic text can be rephrased. --Joy [shallot] 14:21, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I see no evidence to support a claim that the government of Montenegro cannot hold copyright. As someone had to make a decision about it, I simply deleted the article as copyvio. -- Cyrius|✎
Will someone please note that Mount Lovchen is the "black mountain" for which Montenegro is named?
[edit] Article title
Should this article be titled Mount Lovcen instead of just Lovcen? If it decided not, then it should have a redirect for it. —Mike 07:04, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not aware of any other notable landmarks called "Lovcen", so it doesn't need the "Mount" prefix to distinguish itself from other articles. I created the redirect. --Joy [shallot] 11:21, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
-
- The same could be said of Kilimanjaro, which has no disambiguation and yet still redirects to Mount Kilimanjaro. Failing to have found anything at Naming conventions, I added a (minuscule) stub at Mount Lovcen, and a redirect here. --Fbriere 07:08, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- Per User talk:Fbriere#Re: Mount Lovcen, I moved it back over here. Cf. also Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names). --Joy [shallot] 19:05, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Hmm, there's also Lovcen cigarette brand in Serbia & Montenegro... So maybe disambig... I dunno --Dungodung 11:41, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
-
-
