User talk:Louv

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] On System Architect

Hi there. Good work on improving the article. I tweaked it a bit. The {{notability}} tag can be added and removed by any editor when they deem it proper to do so, but soliciting the opinion of other involved editors, as you did, is recommended and commendable.

If possible, please work in external links and book references into the article as references. The remaining links ought to be placed under one of the External links and Further reading sections, as per the layout guideline.

You may also wish to review the guidelines on capitalisation and external links for more information on how to conform to the Wikipedia house style. Happy editing. --elmindreda (talk) 05:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Please don't link directly to book stores. Instead, use the built-in ISBN recognition functionality. Also, not all of the current external links seem essential. Lastly, the article still in my mind reads too much like a news release or advert, so I'm tagging it accordingly. --elmindreda (talk) 06:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

That's starting to look quite good. I moved things around a bit, making the book list into references. It unfortunately led to a few weasel words. If you can make it a bit more specific, that'd be great. I don't have the books for it. The feature list's overuse of capitalised terms is a real eyesore, but I guess it's somewhat unavoidable considering the field and topic, i.e. business computing is like that. I removed the {{external links}} tag as well, even though I personally still don't think they're all essential.

Also, a heads up in case you're editing other related articles; I've nominated Category:CASE Tools for speedy renaming. --elmindreda (talk) 07:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and to avoid confusion, please sign your posts on talk pages. --elmindreda (talk) 07:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Brilliant. I'll be leaving this article now. A pleasure working with you.

The speedy renaming I nominated the category for was strictly due to capitalisation issues (i.e. CASE Tools -> CASE tools). I am, after all, a gnome. If you think the category should be renamed entirely, a proposal will need to be submitted via the regular (slower) categories for discussion process.

Your signature worked as intended. Happy editing! --elmindreda (talk) 18:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)