User talk:Loughlin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi and welcome to my talk page

Welcome!

Hello, Loughlin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Philip Gronowski Contribs 20:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Passage_ferry.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Passage_ferry.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:38, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Help request

Please state the nature of your problem and replace the help me tag when you have done so.—WAvegetarian•(talk) 08:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

I CAN'T INSERT PICTURES I UPLOADED AND IT'S GETTING REALLY ANNOYING!!!!!

I tried to insert a picture on the Glenbrook article in Co. Cork. All thats coming up is a hyperlink to the picture. Maybe you could take a look at that page and tell me what im doing wrong. Thanks Loughlin

Where are you having problems? Are you typing [[Image:IMAGENAME(including file extension)]]?—WAvegetarian•(talk) 08:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Redundant wikilinks

I reverted your See also wikilink to Eire in the Republic of Ireland page. There is really no need to add a See also wikilinks to pages that are already linked to within an article's text. In fact one wikilink to any other page is enough though I do see some multiple links ono some pages and sometimes I revert them because they are redundant. Cheer but keep up the good work. We need constructive Irish Wikipedians. ww2censor 17:01, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your Caesarean Section / Biiliac Width edits

Hi Loughlin. I'm just looking over the Caesarean Section article, and noticed your recent change, which links to Biiliac Width as a "See Also". It looks a lot like the link was put in for the sake of removing the {{linkless}} tag on Biiliac Width, so I'm probably going to revert it unless you speak up. It's not clear as it stands why the link is there - I assume you are suggesting that Pelvic Bone Width can lead to C-sections? (I personally know nothing of the topic). Perhaps you could somehow work the Pelvic Bone link into into the C-section article (with a suitable reference)? Chovain 12:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Chovain, no please feal free to revert it. I haven't a clue what the heck he's on about either but I just think it's a shame to lose articles that somebody might know somthing about. I think that article is a lost cause though as he/she hasn't explained anything!!! --Loughlin 12:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Nah, the article will be fine. It just needs a little work, that's all. No-one seems to have suggested it be deleted; just improved and expanded. I'll see if I can kick it along a little. Chovain 12:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC)