User:Lou Sander/Sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thomas L. Saaty in 2007.
Thomas L. Saaty in 2007.

There IS a good title. Something like "Getting Back to Ted Baxter: Canadian Troops in Vietnam"

The interviewer is Dan Rather without the phony documents, or Michael Palin in the Dead Parrot sketch: he constantly repeats his assertions, but no other source supports them. Like Dan, but unlike Michael, some people continue to believe him. Like Michael, but unlike Dan, there is irrefutable proof that he is wrong.

"Vietnam" vs. "Indochina"
"Troops" vs. "fighting troops" etc.
Canadians going to Vietnam as American troops
Why would Coulter lie?
Why would McKeown and the CBC lie?
Did Coulter know what she was talking about?
Getting back to us
Did McKeown know what he was talking about?
Quote some of the stupid comments of Wikipedians, esp. that computer guy
What is the "outspoken opinion" to which the narrator refers?
What is the "misconception?"

Talk Page Archives: Talk:Ann_Coulter/Archive_14#Canada_and_Vietnam.2FIndochina_.28again.29


Biased or malicious content: WP:BLP

wp:blp#Biased_or_malicious_content|WP:BLP

Birds · Ship Articles

Just visiting 71.245.188.209 06:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Stating private school teacher salaries are 60% of public school teacher salaries when the source Coulter quotes states, "Starting pay in private schools begins at 78 percent that of public schools, rises to 92 percent of public school pay by a teacher's 12th year, and declines thereafter." Coulter's endnote citing this source apparently contains a typographical error. It refers to page 14 in an issue of the online journal EducationNext.[1] Another page in the same issue says "The last comprehensive analysis, performed during the mid-1990s, indicated that average private school salaries were slightly less than 60 percent of average salaries in the public schools," and explains that the 78 percent figure applies to a highly-selected sample of private school teachers.[2]

TEST

ASHL horrific edit is HERE.


HERE is the first crude mention of fisting, by 132.241.246.111. (Follow the link.)

HERE is where Livesayd expands on fisting and moves it to the new category "Liberals and sexuality." Somewhere along the line, somebody had expanded it beyond fisting.

HERE is Derek.cashman's move of fisting to Columns

HERE is Lou Sander's replacement of fisting with something actually from a column

Coulter's weekly syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate is printed in more than 100 newspapers nationwide, and linked to by many conservative websites, including Frontpagemag.com and Townhall.com. Her syndicator says "Ann's client newspapers stick with her because she has a loyal fan base of conservative readers who look forward to reading her columns in their local newspapers."[3]


“ This year's Democratic plan for the future is another inane sound bite designed to trick American voters into trusting them with national security.

To wit, they're claiming there is no connection between the war on terror and the war in Iraq, and while they're all for the war against terror — absolutely in favor of that war — they are adamantly opposed to the Iraq war. You know, the war where the U.S. military is killing thousands upon thousands of terrorists (described in the media as "Iraqi civilians," even if they are from Jordan, like the now-dead leader of al-Qaida in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi). That war. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title

 ”

More stuff might go here.

[edit] References


[edit] Sample 3RR Report

[edit] User:Asbl reported by User:Lou Sander (Result:)

Three revert rule violation on Ann Coulter (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs). Asbl (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log):

Asbl made many changes to this section, undoing the edits of others, changing them, etc. As I read WP:3RR, these are "complex partial reverts."


Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (if applicable) :

Time report made: Lou Sander 20:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: After these reverts, another editor posted a comment about 3RR on User talk:Asbl. Asbl dismissed it. A similar dismissive attitude exists, in my opinion, throughout Asbl's talk page and Edit summaries.

[edit] Templates I Am Authorized to Use

You have made an edit that could be regarded as defamatory. Please do not restore this material to the article or its talk page. If you do, you may be blocked for disruption. See the blocking policy.

You have made an edit that could be regarded as defamatory. Please do not restore this material to the article or its talk page. If you restore this material to the article or its talk page once more, you will be blocked for disruption. See Blocking policy: Biographies of living people.

You have been blocked for disruption of Wikipedia, because you added material that could be regarded as defamatory. See Blocking policy: Biographies of living people. You may return when the block expires. Any further attempt to restore the material will incur another block.

[edit] Citation tester

Here is a Wikipedia citebook citation, with many blanks:

Sander, Louis; Carl Jung, Mickey Mouse [1989-07-04] (January 2007). in Edward Itter: Lou Sander's Tips & Tricks for Commodore Computers, Ben Dover, Improved Edition, Great Computer Books Series, Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. ISBN 0-8306-3192-5. Retrieved on 2007-09-05. “Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.”  This is some stuff at the end. And this is some more.