Talk:Louise Lanctôt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can improve the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

I've blanked the page since it was entirely unsourced. Please add sources for anything before re-inserting anything, per Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. -- Jonel | Speak 18:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

See this BLP Noticeboard report. AvB ÷ talk 23:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

WAS 4.250 added a bunch of sources to the article. If the problem is that lack of sourcing, it would appear to me that the problem has been solved. So what is the reason you blanked it this time, Avb? - TexasAndroid 23:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for alerting me to this. When I didn't see the required in-line cites (<ref>...</ref> references), I didn't scroll down far enough to see the list of refs added below the article body. I will self-revert for now on the assumption that the article is fully supported by the provided sources. I can't guarantee though that others will leave it in place since the assertions in the article still need to be linked directly to the relevant portions of the sources per WP:BLP and especially the WP:CITE guideline. Once in-line cites have been added, the article can be reviewed regarding any remaining WP:BLP issues. Until then, the WP:BLPN report should remain open. AvB ÷ talk 23:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)