Talk:Louis Bachelier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.
France Portal
Louis Bachelier is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.)

Contents

[edit] Grammar

In the Academic Career section, should it read "reconciled himself *with* Bachelier" rather than "reconciled himself *to* Bachelier"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AJR 1978 (talk • contribs) 05:34, 24 December 2005

  • Yes. — Aetheling 12:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
  • My fault. Thanks for pointing it out. I didn't realize that "reconcile to" actually means something quite different. JMBrust 06:50, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Death Date

Could we please get a third reference for the date of his death? The page http://sjepg.univ-fcomte.fr/sjepgbis/libre/bachelier/panneaux/panneau2/panneau2.html shows him dead on the 28th April. (which is correct?)

  • The Dictionary of Scientific Biography also has his dates as 11 March 1870 - 28 April 1946. I added a reference to this effect. -- phoebe/(talk) 00:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • The website of the University of Franche-Comte has a detailed page of facts on Louis Bachelier, including the death date of 28 April 1946. Repères Biographiques — Aetheling 17:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Dissertation committee

The Mathematics Genealogy Project (MGP) lists Henri Poincaré as a "dissertation advisor" for Louis Bachelier. That does not mean that Poincaré was the only advisor, or even that he was the chairman of Bachelier's committee. When one submits an entry to the MGP, the form merely asks for the names of two advisors, labeled "Advisor 1" and "Advisor 2". The website of the Université de Franche-Comte, on this page, lists Paul Appell as the president of the doctoral examination jury (equivalent, perhaps, to chairman of the dissertation committee), and it lists Joseph Boussinesq and Henri Poincaré as the other two committee members. This is at least an indication that Paul Appell was Bachelier's official dissertation chairman, but not proof. I hesitate about concluding this, because it seems to me that of the three examiners Boussinesq had interests far more closely related to Bachelier's thesis topic than did either Appell or Poincaré. — Aetheling 17:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

All of the information above matches with the documents I have read. I understand there were two parts to Bachelier's thesis approval process. The first of these was his written submission of Theory de la Speculation, an original piece of work. The report on this, dated 1900-03-29, concluded with signatures, in order, of " Paul Appell, Henri Poincaré, J. Boussinesq." Secondly there was an oral examination, which in Bachelier's case was about the fluid mechanics work of Boussinesq. A written report following this examination concluded with awarding the grade "Docteur avec mention honorable" and was signed only by Appell. Specifically: "Le président P. Appell"
In defining the infobox field for doctoral advisor I interpret this as mentor to the person under consideration. In the education systems I am familiar with it is, today, formally identified with a student when they start a PhD with an institution. The situation in France circa 1900 may well have been slightly different and using the concept of a examiner could be more appropriate. Still today I believe it is customary for the advisor to be one of the representatives on the thesis assessment board. Bachelier took courses with Poincaré and Boussinesq so, as mentioned above, they look to be obvious candidates. However I've not found any references suggesting he consulted with, or was advised by, either on his doctoral work. Although we have circumstantial evidence, in the absence of a concrete reference that either was assigned as Bachelier's advisor, I think we have to leave the field empty since doing otherwise would go against the verifiability concept.
Any comments, assistance, suggestions or clarifications provided will be gratefully received. — Asperal 20:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)