Talk:Lost Lake (Minnesota)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, which aims to improve all articles related to Minnesota.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article is on a subject of Mid-importance within Minnesota articles.
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	Lost Lake (Minnesota) is part of WikiProject Lakes, a WikiProject which aims to systematically improve lake-related articles using the tools on the Project page. You are welcome and encouraged to edit the article attached to this page and to join the project.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

Recently, I wrote this article, but an admin deleted it because they thought I made it up. Try Googling "Mound Minnesota Lost Lake" to see that it really exists. I wish to avoid having to keep rewriting the article. It's not the best writing I have done, but over time, myself and others will work on it. This lake is as significant as many other lakes in Lake Minnetonka. (Lake Minnetonka is really about 30 connected lakes.) Other lakes are included in WP, so is that a good enough reason for it to be included? Also, it is true that Mound has bet a lot on Lost Lake, and some people do take issue with the Council's handling of it. (Also, see my Talk page that covers what the admin and I discussed.) Nanabozho 01:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

The "45 acres" is my farmers estimate using a Google map and comparing it to a lake of known area (Langdon). An acre, for you city boys, is about 220 feet by 220 feet. Nanabozho 17:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)