User talk:Lordchander
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
[edit] Metroads
Good work with the Metroad template. My only concern is that Metroad 1 signage doesn't seem to be in use anywhere on the line of route anymore, even though it retains the designation. As such, we should probably merge or clearly differentiate Metroad 1 (Brisbane) and M1, Queensland, even though the latter is longer than the former, extending to Tugun and not Beenleigh. Any ideas? Jammo (SM247) 23:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
---The only reason I actually created Metroad 1 was because I felt it would add completeness to Brisbane's Metroads articles. I thought it might look strange on the Template without having Metro 1. I'm up for ideas on what we could do to fix the situation, but I feel that it shouldnt't be deleted. By the way, where does Metroad 1 officially end? I thought it was Beenleigh... LC 06:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- From memory, it ends at either the City Road or Rochester Dr interchanges. Hard to tell now as all the signage has been changed to M1 between Tugun and Bald Hills. I know it wouldn't have gone past Beenleigh. Jammo (SM247) 06:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- I don't know if we share a common goal here, but I'd love to see the road system in Australia's articles much more deatiled and better looking. If you check out the articles on the roads in the USA, there is so much detailed information and great templates that I would love to see in this area of Wikipedia. LC 07:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Phenomena.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Phenomena.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Worshiphim.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:Worshiphim.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)