User talk:Lordbyte

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is suspected that this user is a sock puppet of Joehazelton.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(info: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

I am not this person, and your assumtion is without cause or reason. Is this byte the noobie... Your have no reason for this.

Mr Santin... Is it a violation of wikipolicy to read this Wikipedia help files so that I may have a "Shocking Familiarity with Wikipedia".

It would seem that it's SOP for admin, to have such "Shocking disrespect" for the basic human concept of civility and due process(even with in the twisted set of unevenly enforced Wikpolicy)?

Uncivil, unjustified and shows total lack of respect.Lordbyte 22:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am not a sockpuppet or Joehazelton and this action is very uncivil and lack the good faith, which wikipedia alleges to have. Do a check user and find out the truth that I am not Joehazelton or any one you know."

Decline reason: "For a supposedly brand new user, you're displaying a shocking familiarity with Wikipedia policies and norms, in addition to editing much the same articles as the user you're accused of being a sockpuppet of. Sorry. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.