User talk:LordByronKing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, LordByronKing, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Nunquam Dormio 06:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] your editing behavior

Hi, I've noticed you've been making lots of contributions over the past few days yet discussed little of it with other editors on the corresponding talk pages. For example - you listed 7 books by the author Steeves Volmar under a section you created entitled "Notable Bisexual Black Erotic Novels" this might be deemed controversial, or even propaganda. Often seven books by the same author are not necessary in such a list, and it seems unlikely that ALL seven are notable (perhaps the best-selling among them would be enough). Secondly, the categorical list itself does not belong in the Bisexuality article as there has yet to be anything written about the notability of blacks needing to deal with bisexuality as opposed to other races. If this is something you feel knowledgable about I invite and enourage you to add a section on it. As of yet however, I feel that your additions are best placed with other notable erotic novels, and that you select the best seller among them rather than all seven (since I can't personally determine the notability of these books at all). Additionally, your edits in other articles, along with this one, are disruptive to the editing process. It's much more considerate to try and make all your changes at once, rather than adding one sentence, saving, and adding another. When you make controversial changes, it's also considered good form to add references or at least discuss them on the talk page, one case is on Mr 18 inch, where you referred to him as bisexual, just because he's been in porn with transvestites. If he identifies as hetero it is libelous to say otherwise. -Zappernapper 21:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

  • You don't appear to be communicating with other users. Do you know that talk pages like this one are editable in the same was as articles? Please communicate with other users on user talk pages and article talk pages before making unsourced edits like the ones you have been making. If you don't talk and play well with others, it's difficult to assume good faith and you may be blocked. Fernando Rizo 19:17, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Please don't make the word "bisexual" or any other word bold if it isn't the title of the article. You are calling undue notice to the word in articles which have little to do with the word. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:31, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You are indefinitely blocked for repeatedly inserting yourself into articles. If you want to become unblocked, and contribute usefully, you can send me an email by clicking on the "E-mail this user" link on my User page, or by requesting an unblock on this page (which is the only page you can now edit). To become unblocked, you must pledge to quit trying to spam your name and your works throughout Wikipedia. User:Zoe|(talk) 18:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)