Talk:Lorica hamata

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lorica hamata article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Military technology and engineering task force Weaponry task force Associated task forces (periods and conflicts): Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC–c. 500 AD)

[edit] Added more info regarding lorica hamata & lorica segmenta

Added this part: "and the Roman Empire up to the 2nd century, when it was briefly replaced by lorica segmenta, but then was reintroduced in the 4th century CE."

Chainmail was used by the legionaries up to the 2nd century CE. It was briefly replaced by lorica segmenta/iron band armor in the 2nd-3rd centuries, but was reintroduced as the standard armor of the Roman empire in the 4th century. -- Intranetusa (talk) 18:22, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bronze Chainmail ?

Chainmail made of Bronze? It sounds strange. The earliest mentions and samples of this type of armor we have got come from iron cultures, for good reason.

Bronze lends itself well to casting and forging, but lacks the ductility of iron, and is not very useful as wire, being too stiff and prone to breaking. On the other hand, the production of chainmail, especially in large quantities, depends on the rings being mass produced from wire, rather than hand fashioned one at a time. Neither would mass-cast rings be too practical, as you would still need to link them together, which is easier with wire ones that lend themselves more easily to this kind of manipulation, before being hammered closed.

Are there any sources for bronze chainmail? --Svartalf 14:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

I've never heard that Roman mail was made from anything other than iron. All modern reproductions I've ever seen (and I own a suit of lorica hamata myself) are iron or steel. Suggest we edit this statement, as I think it's probably false.--Caliga10 12:27, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Accuracy

This paragraph

Around 5AD the Lorica Hamata became less common as Lorica Segmentata was much cheaper and quicker to make - an important fact when there were so many men to arm. However some African and Asian legions are thought to have kept it till it became standard issue again in the last years of the Empire.

was recently added and I think it's inaccurate. My understanding is that lorica segmentata was only in use from 0-5 AD until about 70 AD, and probably never worn by even the majority of legionaries during that time period. Other opinions?--Caliga10 11:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

As far as I know, the conventional thinking is that Lorica Segmentata was always less widespread than Lorica Hamata and probably fell out of what general use it had enjoyed in the Late Second Century / Early Third Centuray AD; the reasons for it's introduction and eventual disappearance remain matters open to debate.--M.J.Stanham 21:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

The earliest dated segmentata to be found has been dated to 9 BC. Prior to that it was thought 9 AD was the earliest, from Kalkriese. It is also now thought to have possibly been in use up until the 4th C. AD. There can be no certainty about the ratio of use between hamata and segmentata as the representational record contradicts itself (major monuments show a great deal of segmentata in use, the possibly more reliable Adamklissi Metopes show none as do most if not all of the individual grave stele). But the archaeological record of actual finds you can hold in your hands shows segmentata in great use all over the Roman world, from Scotland to Syria. This is not a subject of absolute definitive knowledge, so be wary of making bold statements. - J. Bowers

J Bowers, the lorica segmenta was invented quite early, but not used in any significant number. The vast majority of lorica segmentas when it was used in mass comes from the 2nd-3rd centuries. Before and after this timeframe, chainmail was the standard issue for Roman legionaries. Most pictures of Roman legionaries depict them wearing chainmail. Trajan's column (2nd cent) is one of the few instances that depict the use of lorica segmenta. -- Intranetusa (talk) 18:26, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Lorica segmentata was still common used in 2nd century. Lorica hamata started been used again in the half of the 3 rd century. In 2nd it was stil Lorica segmentata (Corbridge A,B, Newstead, late model).--213.151.217.129 (talk) 17:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)