Talk:Lord Brocktree (Redwall)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Redwall, a WikiProject related to the Redwall universe. If you would like to participate, see the project page, where you can join the project, talk over new ideas, offer suggestions, and coordinate improvements. |
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. -- Kjkolb 09:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Lord Brocktree → Lord Brocktree (Redwall) … Rationale: Lord Brocktree is a book in the Redwall series. Lord Brocktree is also a fictional character in the book of the same name. Currently, the book is located at Lord Brocktree (novel) and the fictional character is at Lord Brocktree. Per Wikipedia naming conventions, the book should be under the article title Lord Brocktree, while I propose that the character be moved to Lord Brocktree (Redwall). … Please share your opinion at Talk:Lord Brocktree. —Runch 19:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Neutral actually my reading of the naming conventions is that the things are more fluid and flexible than you suggest. It is perfectly acceptable to keep the current naming. It may be that to swap things arround would reflect the more popular search term for a reader - difficult to determine though. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- True, it's just my point of view that the average Wikipedia browser who searches for "Lord Brocktree" will be interested in the book, and a disambiguation link can be added to the top of the article for the fictional character. As you say, it's hard to judge what the 'average' Wikipedian thinks, though. --Runch 15:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
