User talk:Londoner1961

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Londoner1961, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Ronz 22:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)


Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ronz 22:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

See also WP:BLP. --Ronz 22:03, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

I was surprised by your comment and by the deletion of my entry as the points I made are a matter of public record through filings at Companies House, are backed by primary sources, and are of legitimate interest in the context of a site which names the companies in question. I will, however, take care to list the sources when I re-post the material.

Londoner1961 00:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm surprised you wrote the comments above, then started edit warring immediately afterward. Let's see what Athaenara thinks. --Ronz 00:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:BLP

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Tom Barker. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ronz 15:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Not sure I understand what you mean by "warring" or by "unreferenced controversial biographical content". The page mentions b consultants ltd and SmartSlab Ltd. The information regarding those companies, and which I posted, is a matter of public record at Companies House. As it happens, I was a shareholder in b consultants ltd, before it went bust, and remain a shareholder in, and am an ex-director of, SmartSlab Ltd, so I have copies of all the accounts, as well as much other public information.

Could you please explain to me what your problem is with public information related to these companies being published on the page?

Londoner1961 22:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

I hope WP:BLP explains the situation. Further, there are WP:COI issues here. I've started a discussion in the article talk page. I'll try to get some help as well from Athaenara again. --Ronz 22:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. It would be more helpful, however, if you were to be specific rather than simply referencing catch-all guidance with which I am familiar and with which, in my view, I am compliant.

Londoner1961 01:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm not ignoring your comments here, but hoping we're answering them in the article talk page. --Ronz 15:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

No problem, I had noticed! Thanks for taking an interest.

Londoner1961 16:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ronz (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

At least I am not using Wiki as a vehicle for posting misleading and inaccurate advertisements for myself and my business enterprises!

Londoner1961 (talk) 08:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tom Barker

Hello. I'm a volunteer at the biographies of living persons noticeboard and was drawn to the above article by an open ticket there. You may already be well aware of this, but I just wanted to note in regards to the comment removed from Talk:Tom Barker on February 13th that it is not only possible, but also encouraged to provide neutral, balanced coverage of living individuals with biographies on Wikipedia. It's simply a matter of providing reliable secondary sourcing and ensuring that we do not make implications with our tone. If you have solid reason to believe that any other editor involved in the article has a conflict of interest and is blocking legitimate, sourced criticism, there are avenues you can take to redress that, including the conflict of interest noticeboard. Quite probably the best method of addressing this is first ensuring that your sourcing for contentious information is impeccable. Lacking sound secondary sources, we must be conservative in writing about living persons in any Wikipedia space, including talk pages. This is in large part for Wikipedia's protection. Please feel free to leave a note at my talk page if you'd like to discuss these policies further. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Have done so, thanks.

Londoner1961 (talk) 14:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)