Talk:London slang
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject London, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to London. If you would like to participate, you can improve the article attached to this page or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 August 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Contents |
[edit] Sub culture
This sounds like a particular sub-culture's slang, rather than London slang. Many of the words do not need explaining here as their meanings are just the same as those found in any dictionary or in many other places. For example, 'dry' means boring anywhere in England, 'blank' means ignore anywhere, and so on. This needs addressing, because it's deleteworthy otherwise. Brequinda 07:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- If this is London slang at all, it's not anything I've heard, in 20 years of living in London. In any case, a proper article on slang in London would be far more detailed than this, as it would need to describe all the different kinds of slang prevalent in different London ethnic and socioeconomic groups, as well as subcultures. -- Karada 07:59, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Definition
For a definition on London slang, you actually get a fair bit of it wrong. To address what the person above said about 'dry' meaning the same in the rest of the UK as it does in London, that's because slang terms tend to filter away from London to other parts and gets adopted or further bastardised.
- I don't think this is a very good article overall. The UK has very distinctive regional slang, and while some London slang does filter into general usage, this cannot generally be said to be the case. This article should not be a redirect from "British slang". Furthermore, the examples of slang are ropey (sic: "of poor quality"). For example, "The Gherkin" is not slang ("A kind of language occurring chiefly in casual and playful speech, made up typically of short-lived coinages and figures of speech that are deliberately used in place of standard terms for added raciness, humor, irreverence, or other effect.), it's a nickname ("A descriptive name added to or replacing the actual name of a person, place, or thing.")
- This article needs significant improvement – if it doesn't receive some, I will add it to Pages needing attention. Didsbury ryder 20:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- Attention notice added Didsbury ryder 19:08, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] POV
"One problem with identifying what is specifically London slang is that the dominant cultural position that London has within the United Kingdom causes London slang to be exported to the rest of the UK, leading to London slang becoming general United Kingdom English slang." Sloppily worded, and POV. Slang travels around the country, not just from London. --kingboyk 08:28, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Yeah exactly. I live in Leeds, and ive barely heard any of these words used. Besides, the UK isnt totally subject to London culturally, thats POV. There is widespread regional slang —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.38.250.69 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 26 April 2006.
I edited where i felt appropriate... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.109.10.213 (talk • contribs) 01:27, 24 May 2006.
[edit] The list of words
The list of common London slang words must be shortened considerably. 5-10 examples would be enough, but I don't live in London (any longer) so I have no idea what 5-10 should be left. Could somebody more familiar with it shorten it? Mackan 17:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
With all due respect, the huge and diverse population of London means that 'common' london slang includes many examples. I personally dony see a problem with it, as the page Boston slang contains far more examples than this one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.41.117.87 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 27 June 2006.
- It is clearly stated in [1] that Wikipedia is not a dictionary and that it's no place for dictionary definitions nor lists of such definitions. I haven't seen the Boston slang article but if that one has many examples, it too should probably be shortened. Mackan 14:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok...then I'll shorten it to about 10 examples if it means that much to you. And i know its not a dictionary etc, but surely the articles are supposed to give good representations on the subjects theyre about. And like you said, you dont live in London any more, so leave the criticism of the article to those of us who do.
- Keep a civil tone, it's not about who's living in London and who isn't, it's about the way Wikipedia articles are written. Mackan 04:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Im lost. I get told to shorten it to 10 examples. I do so. Someone lengthens it to about 30 examples. I change it back, and im told im vandalising.
It was previously stated that a "pony" is London slang for £100. I changed this, because it is actually £25. - Zestos, 7 Dec 06, 20:60 (GMT)
- That's certainly a baffling table. I live in East London and I have never ever heard half the words in it used, though some are, of course, well old Minder/Sweeney stock-in-trade... Tarquin Binary 00:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Attention: Slang Glossary policy discussion underway
Slang glossaries violate the following policy:
Wikipedia is not a dictionary or a usage or jargon guide. Wikipedia articles are not:
- Dictionary definitions. Because Wikipedia is not a dictionary, please do not create an entry merely to define a term. An article should usually begin with a good definition; if you come across an article that is nothing more than a definition, see if there is information you can add that would be appropriate for an encyclopedia. An exception to this rule is for articles about the cultural meanings of individual numbers.
- Lists of such definitions. There are, however, disambiguation pages consisting of pointers to other pages; these are used to clarify differing meanings of a word. Wikipedia also includes glossary pages for various specialized fields.
- A usage guide or slang and idiom guide. Wikipedia is not in the business of saying how words, idioms, etc. should be used. We aren't teaching people how to talk like a Cockney chimney-sweep. However, it may be important in the context of an encyclopedia article to describe just how a word is used to distinguish among similar, easily confused ideas, as in nation or freedom. In some special cases an article about an essential piece of slang may be appropriate.
Due to the many AfDs which are initiated to enforce this policy and due to the resistance to such deletion by defenders of the glossaries, I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#Slang glossaries to rewrite the policy in order to solve this problem and to readdress this question: should slang glossaries by allowed on Wikipedia? --List Expert 23:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edited Modern London Slang and removed 'School Slang'
I've gone to great length sourcing and explaining the origin of modern London slang.
The 'school slang' section needed to be removed, as this 'School Slang' is just a form of Modern London Slang. The list of words was also far too long.
The slang spoken in school is just the same as the Jafaican slang in the paragraph above. It does not warrant its own badly-written explaination followed by a huge list of examples. Mkimemia 06:27, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jafaican
Gal dem? Greazy? Choong? This is just a list of Jafaican. Why not use a list of GENERAL London slang, not one used only by a particular sub-culture. This needs to be changed.
