Talk:London Olympians (American football)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] New Construction
Having noted the underconstruction tag and the recent edits, I wonder what the goal is. So far the article appears not to have been improved by the added information. A list of non-notable players for what is essentially an amateur sports club doesn't seem to have a great deal of merit for instance. MLA 14:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- If you don't like the list of 'mediocre' players (which is bassicaly what you're calling them, even though they have won endlessly), then just tell me, before you get rid of it. But i'm just trying to formalise the article with images and an infobox (created by the styles of the French). Pafcool2 17:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- I raised this for discussion here rather than just intervene myself as I'm happy to discuss the merits of inclusion. Article's already looking better than when I first saw the underconstruction link. I'm not calling the players mediocre - I'm using a wikipedia technical term - non-notable ie none of these guys are ever likely to have their own articles so a list of them is a list of non-notable people even if they're a really good amateur gridiron team. MLA 10:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)