Talk:London Docklands

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The Albert Memorial" - the London Portal's current "Showcase Picture" This article is part of WikiProject London, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to London. If you would like to participate, you can improve the article attached to this page or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article is part of WikiProject Ports, a project to improve all ports-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ports-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
B rated as B-Class on the assessment scale
Low rated as low-importance on the assessment scale

This (really rather good) article could do with somee historical pics. Also a mention of the impact the National Dock Labour Scheme would be useful. Icundell 21:57, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)Bold text:Actually, when I get a mo I'll go through the Docklands Today section - it's so full of puff f[ ofsit could have been written by a local fvrrwfve fact the article itself refers to "London Docklands" in several places, this seems appropriate?Stevage 00:41, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Agree to rename to be a more specific one, like the purposed London Docklands -- 172.178.182.82 12:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I thought it was poorly named, too: definitely a good move. Then docklands can be general with links to all the specific articles. JackyR | Talk 14:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Link to Amsterdam

Would someone who can make the syntax work like to insert a fourth link in this list of interesting docklandses?

"Amsterdam Eastern Docks" to point to nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oostelijk Havengebied

Much obliged TobyJ 12:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Poor choice of language

"...Nick Schroeder, formed the Iron Triangle (LDDC) because he felt like it." - surely this isn't appropriate for an encyclopedia article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.221.87 (talk) 10:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)