Talk:Loma Linda University

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

	Loma Linda University is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church and Seventh-day Adventist Church-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church To-do: edit  Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

[edit] On the Alumni

Should we keep the notable alumni section as is? For every other wikipedia article that discusses notable alumni, it just links their name to a separate page, and doesn't make a giant table of them. In any case, I'll try and help out with typos and other stuff also Minnyhaha (talk) 06:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Neutrality

We need to establish neutrality within articles related to the Seventh-day Adventist church. In several articles beyond having a simple discription of what the link leads to there is a litigation report or something the Adventist did wrong. Can we just post, this includes Fermion, articles that are objective to listing facts and not distorted representation. For example on the Loma Linda University page you list were it is located, what its mission statement is, and Oh Yeah . . . it was in such and such court hearing on discrimination charges. What about spending time on listing what it has to offer like departments, schools, programs, leaders, teachers, deans, etc. Who cares that they fired someone. Some people may be using wikipedia as a source of information about a school. They may be deciding to go there in the future and your article is not helping them get objective information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.103.183.8 (talk • contribs) .

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia editors are required to assume good faith in their fellow editors. Your claim based on a few edits that had clear reasons based in Wikipedia policies, is not well gounded. Ansell 09:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)