Talk:Logitech G5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
Erm, why not leave it up i mean.24.170.236.240 Well its nice to have an article on the g5 you might as well kill or merge all other mouse pages on wikipedia if you get rid of this one, Besides why not? Wera
i'm not sure this article is necessary. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.118.0.95 (talk • contribs).
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Advanced Game settings.JPG
Image:Advanced Game settings.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 2007 version
Of note is that the new version is slightly better on different surfaces than the older one. I own the new one, and my friend owns the old version. Upon testing/comparing the old one didnt work on certain surfaces (e.g. jeans) where as the new version did (this is without using the setpoint software). Don't suppose this should go in the article unless I can find some evidence somewhere to cite. cncplyr (talk) 18:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
