Talk:Loan to value
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Merge with Combined loan to value
In both this article and combined loan to value, I saw a big mess. But it seems to me that these two articles belong together, especially after seeing extensive references in combined loan to value to this article.
What do you think?
AndreniW 01:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
I agree. Information from both articles should be merged into Loan To Value. Mtmelendez 16:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I also agree. Combined Loan to Value should be a section of LTV.
-- I don't agree with this. Though CLTV can be assumed as an extension of LTV, but we should let them into their own existence. So that it won't be a overdose for a person at a time. Suggestions ?
[edit] Merge Loan-to-value ratio into this article
Loan-to-value ratio refers to exactly the same thing as this article, and I believe it should be merged in. Do you agree? --Crocodile Punter 13:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- I merged them. I put everything here because this was the more substantial article of the two. (Most of "Loan to value ratio" was a tutorial for figuring out the LTV ratio and Wikipedia policy discourages this.) However, it looks like "LTV ratio" Google=1,070,000 is more common than "LTV" alone Google=617,000. I think this article should be moved to LTV ratio to preserve the edit history, but since everything already redirects here that's a minor point. Tocharianne 17:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Link Spam
Are the links to ehow.com and doityourself.com in the references section just link spam? Having clicked on the links I can't see how they relate to the artical at all. References should be to information that support the WP entry. The Yahoo entry isn't much better. I suggest the whole 'References' section is deleted. I'll do so in 2 weeks if there's no objection. Slothie 10:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Why only mortgages?
LTV is a concept used in many other kinds of lending as well. Uucp 19:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
