User talk:Livedvalid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 


Emmett5 23:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[[[[ Thank you, Emmett5! I sign as suggested. Here goes again, fingers crossed: Livedvalid 23:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vickers VC10/Vickers VC-10

Hi. It's common practice (and recommended practice) to add new items at the bottom of a talk page. Secondly, while I stand to be corrected, I have no memory of moving the article, nor can I find it in the history. Also, I noticed your edit summary a couple of days ago: "the first half of a major copyedit to this absolutely appalling entry which would not score higher than 30% in a fifth grade test" — might I suggest it is not the most constructive way of summarising your contributions. Best regards Mark83 17:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Moved

I know we agreed it wasn't my fault in the first place, but just to let you know it was still a good point and I've moved the article to Vickers VC10. Also, I've moved my comment above from your user page. Apologies for that mistake. Mark83 19:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Your edits to Attraction to disability

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to attraction to disability. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. PWdiamond 01:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for calling by. I could hardly vandalise a page I have created, now, could I? It has occurred to me that I make too many edits, but "nonsense" is a bit rich! It has taken me a bit of time to get things back to where they were. You will excuse me, but your intervention threw out several scientific papers (First, 2005, Lawrence, 2006 and others) and an important scientific point, so it was imperative to reinstate things. By the way, I do not always log in, so 85.xx whatever (the user to whom you reverted my edits) was actually me. Livedvalid 01:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Hello Livedavalid, and thanks for contacting me. I have reviewed your comments and see that the revert was made in error. Your edit triggered the anti-vandal tool that myself and others use because it contained a trigger word (Wannabees). I reviewed the edit further and it appeared that someone was trying to insert content meant to alter the validity of the article, therefore I did a revert.

I apologize for the inconvenience, however in the future if something like that happens, you'll find it's very easy to go back to your version, as it only takes two clicks. You do not need to rewrite any pieces of the article, as Wikipedia keeps a copy of all revisions. For detailed information on how to do this visit WP:REVERT. Please feel free to contact me if I can be of any assistance, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, and for your understanding.PWdiamond 01:57, 24 December 2006 (UTC)