From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome
Hello, Livada! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 13:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Getting started
|
|
Getting help
|
|
Policies and guidelines
|
|
|
The community
|
|
Writing articles
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
|
[edit] Mačva District
Hi! I noticed you've been removing Category:Mačva District from several pages, and I'm a bit curious why. Having the categories helps to sort the articles, but I don't want to go reverting you if there's a valid reason for the removal. Were the pages incorrectly categorized or something? -Bbik★ 01:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think that Mačva District category should have only municipality articles, and village articles should be in Mačva category. Problem is that Mačva district is larger than Mačva region and thus if we include villages into both categories we would make confusion whether these villages are located in region of Mačva or not. Livada
- I don't really have the time to deal with anything around here right now, but here's my understanding of how the categorization works. For any given article, it's better to make categories as specific as possible, while also keeping them from overlapping. It sounds like the district is entirely within the region, thereby making the district category the more specific one. With those points in mind, I think any villages in the district/municipality should also be in that category (but not the region category), otherwise it's unclear (looking only at categories) whether they're in the district, or just the overall region. If any of the villages previously in the category are only in the region, not also the district, they should be in the region category instead. Does that make sense? -Bbik★ 17:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Agreement
In article Demographic history of Bačka there has been discussion and agreement has been reached. Changing of article today is very hard job. Seeing comments of user:Hobartimus in my thinking it is possible to put your map in part of article 2001/2002 because you map is showing situation in 2002. Maybe I making mistake but putting map in begining of article will be reverted ... --Rjecina 16:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)