User:Littleteddy/Standards
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I have decided that I will develop some RfA standards similar to Useight's when !voting in RfAs. When I oppose RfAs I could say 'Sorry, fails my standard: Number of Edits'.
Contents |
[edit] Number of edits
- 1000 Mainspace edits
or
- 500 Mainspace edits
and
- 500 Project space edits
- Evidence of contact with other users (e.g. high use of user talk or talk pages)
- Good (80%+) use of edit summaries
- Over 3000 edits
[edit] Activity
- At least 4 months of active contribution
or
- 6000+ edits
and
- At least 3 months of active contribution
[edit] Conduct
- Has not been warned for non-vandalism edits in the last 4 months
- No (non-accidental) vandalism in the last 6 months
- No blocks in the past year
or
- No blocks since becoming an editor (where an editor has been here for less than a year)
[edit] I don't care if...
- The nominee runs a bot
- The nominee self-nominates
- The nominee is willing to add him/herself to CAT:AOR
- The nominee has edited in the userspace a lot
- The nominee focusses on WP:AfD, WP:RFPP etc.
- The nominee has few edits to WP:AIV
- The nominee runs on a three-revert rule or a one-revert rule
- The nominee has gone through admin coaching
[edit] But I do care if...
- The nominee answers only a few of the optional questions
- The nominee has only been fighting vandalism rather than being an 'all-rounder'
- The nominee is not a member of any WikiProjects
- I feel that I should apply Ignore All Rules in supporting/opposing a nominee