Talk:Little Nobody
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
 |
Little Nobody is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music. See also P:AUSMUSIC. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 24/2/2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Every picture equinox.gif
Image:Every picture equinox.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Little Nobody - Slam-dunk Ninja cover 2007.JPG
Image:Little Nobody - Slam-dunk Ninja cover 2007.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Little Nobody Action Hero 2000.jpg
Image:Little Nobody Action Hero 2000.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Little Nobody Reaction Hero.jpg
Image:Little Nobody Reaction Hero.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Zzslam-dunk Ninja Ninja Daddy.jpg
Image:Zzslam-dunk Ninja Ninja Daddy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Contesting Speedy Deletion as Advertisement
Hi everyone, I just want to confirm what I told Alex and High Tree, that I'm not related to Andrez Begen, but we have worked together in the media in Melbourne quite a bit - we were both writers at Inpress and then worked at TRM magazine in 2000/01, so we've kept in touch.
Andrez sent me a lot of his old stories because I'm writing a history of independent music in Melbourne and I have put some of this information on the entries here for people he interviewed. I'm a big admirer of Melbourne techno (its my hometown, so I am biased I guess!) and i also wrote a listing for Voiteck which was deleted, plus have working on the Zen Paradox and Every Picture Tells A Story entries.
Anyway I hope this clears things up and if you feel there is a conflict of interest I will stop adding info on him and/or the Melbourne scene. Sorry for any misunderstandings!!!! I don't think the Little Nobody entry should be deleted, and it should stay in Wikipedia.
Its definitely news worthy - Bergen is cited in The Age (one of Australia's principle daily newspapers) here, along with references from The Weekend Australian (another national newspaper), Britain's Muzik magazine, and Rolling Stone. His Little Nobody project has been doing music for over a decade, one of his albums was nominated at the Australian Dance Music Awards, and hes still doing music.
But I understand your concerns and it would be great if you could get someone else to rewrite the material there, as obviously I'm not doing it right and stepping accidentally on toes! But I could try to rewrite if if you want, to try to make it less so - it's a bit of a pet project for me, and some of my others have already been deleted, which is sad. please let me know!Nina phunsta (talk) 09:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] ==
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE HANG-ON, as per above notes - somebody removed it in the past 24 hours, without making any notes at all on these pages and I'm not too sure why that was done when the HANG ON tag specifically says "This template should not be removed from a page still marked with a speedy deletion template". If I'm missing something, could you fill me in? Sorry - I'm fairly new at all this and a bit confused!!!
If it is removed, can you tell me why? That would be great. Thanks!! Nina phunsta (talk) 23:37, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
