Talk:List of tallest buildings in Singapore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten. |
| List | This article has been rated as List-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, which aims to create, expand, and maintain articles that relate to skyscrapers, high-rises and towers. To participate, visit the project page for more information. |
| List | This article has been rated as List-Class on the assessment scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the assessment scale. |
 |
 An attempt to better coordinate and organise articles related to Singapore. To participate, simply edit this page or visit our noticeboard for more info. |
| List | This article has been rated as List-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Samsung Hub
There is a number 5, Sumsung Hub right in between 23 and 24. Should the rest be moved down?GavinTing 09:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] One Raffles Quay
Aren't the One Raffles Quay North and South towers already completed? Shouldn't the North tower entry in the "Under Construction" list be moved to the Completed list? Lowjoel 12:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Raising the maximum height limit?
there was discussion about raising the 280M limit, but the air authorities were only willing to increase that ceiling but a little. it the end, it was view that a moderate increase in height limit would not do much to improve the skyline, especially when compared to the height of the tallest builing in the world. so the 280M limit was retain. Akinkhoo (talk) 15:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:New Singapore downtown possible look.png
Image:New Singapore downtown possible look.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Marina Bay Financial Centre artist impression.jpg
Image:Marina Bay Financial Centre artist impression.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Poor Writing
"The highest natural point in Singapore is at 161 metres high, which is relatively low compared to other countries. This is partly due to Singapore's particularly flat terrain."
That's not an explanation, it's stating the same fact in different words. The fact that Singapore has a relatively low highest point is not "partly due" to the fact that Singapore is particularly flat; you might as well say that Singapore is particularly flat because it has a low highest point. It's like saying that someone flies into rages a lot because they have an angry disposition, or that ice cream is bad for you because it has a deleterious effect on your health. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.127.136 (talk) 07:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
