Talk:List of recurring characters in Entourage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Started 2 McQuiwick? 3 Character placing 4 Miller Gold Agency

[edit] Started

Just getting this info off the main Entourage page to start cleaning it up. Eventually I'm going to flesh this page out to give it a lot more detail I just wanted to get the ball rolling. -- Argash  |  talk  |  contribs  12:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] McQuiwick?

Where does this spelling come from? It seems made up to me, considering the only google hits are from sites with open editing (except for a local newspaper that incorrectly spells Sloan as "Sloane"). The normal spelling of that name is Mackewich. I also searched http://www.familysearch.org/ and got no hits for McQuiwick, and around 25 for Mackewich. I am changing the spelling. If someone can provide a more official source, feel free to change it back. – flamurai (t) 09:11, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Good call, I can't find any info on HBO's site or IMDB so I'd say the standard spelling would be the way to go.  Argash  |  talk  |  contribs  10:14, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Character placing

I moved Ari's kids into minor characters and Sloan into major characters; in terms of episode appearances and plot involvement (Sloan was central to several of her episodes), I thought it made more sense that way. That OK with everyone? 86.42.165.72 (talk) 05:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

sloan can no longer be in major characters since she is gone for good.!Tj21 (talk) 03:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Miller Gold Agency

Someone keeps inserting a line saying that Ari owns a majority stake in Miller Gold. That does not appear to be the case, especially from watching the negotiation scene. If anyone has an argument that Ari does own a majority please state it here. Thanks.

160.39.221.87 (talk) 23:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Okay 160.39.221.87 about the agency. I have watched the episode that other person has stated. and this is how the conversation starts babs stated she wanted 51% of the company and ari says he would rather f***. So he ends up getting babs to agree to 49%, but she says okay to that only if her name goes first in the new company. BUT, in season 4, its clear that the writers changed it, since he tells Babs according to their partnership agreement they BOTH have to agree on a termination of an agent. So it is now 50/50%. So I think we should just leave it that its either: a) unclear in their EXACT partnership agreement or b) 50/50 partnerships agreement according to season 4. Tj21 (talk) 02:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

i put it closer to what i said as b) but free to change it to a, but don't mention the initial terms. Hopefully then we can stop this continuous edits on the two pages I see occuring Tj21 (talk) 02:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I have also watched the scene and it seems pretty clear that they agree to a 50-50. The conversation starts with her wanting a much higher percent of the firm (60% I think), that is when Ari makes his comment. They negotiate down until Babs says she'll take 51, Ari tells her 49 in response. The two of them stop for a moment and give each other a look. Ari makes an expression like "I think we know how this is going to end up." They don't show them agree to the split but if you take a closer look it seems pretty clear that they were going to split the difference. 160.39.221.87 (talk) 06:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)