Talk:List of plasma physicists
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
|
Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Eric Lerner
Why is Eric Lerner's entry marked with "His level of expertise is controversial" with a link to a page of complaints by astrophysicists? Even if those are indeed errors (which is not a given), last I checked this was a list of plasma physicists, not of astrophysicists. Since no plasma physicist mentions any errors on his part in the field of plasma physics, that sentence must be removed, together with the link. (And even if one makes a wild assumption of him making errors in the field of plasma physics, of which I'm unaware, this is no grounds to blackmouth someone's level of expertise. All scientists make mistakes every now and then. Otherwise, we would have never seen multiple hypotheses formulated on the same subject.) Leokor (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
