Talk:List of people in Playboy 2000–present

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Table format 2 Centerfold List? 3 pics 4 Playboy store links 5 20 questions

[edit] Table format

Say! The table format is lookin good :)  The Steve  19:04, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

Not since July 15th. While the idea of puting the years in separate tables makes sense, the seemingly-random arrangement of columns is really ugly. RossPatterson 00:59, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I've adjusted the tables to be the same layout for all years, and it looks much better to me. RossPatterson 01:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for doing that. When the tables were changed it bugged me that they weren't all the same. Dismas|^(talk) 01:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Centerfold List?

Can we have a list of just the Playmates of the Month? CFLeon 00:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Why? It would just repeat what's already here. Dismas|^(talk) 21:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] pics

You should put a cover pic for each issue --Jaysscholar 19:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

We can't. It's been tried in the past and then they were taken out. Under the rules of fair use for which magazine covers are used, there has to be some sort of critical commentary on the issue pictured, which this list does not do. Dismas|^(talk) 21:12, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Playboy store links

Why do we have links to each issue at the Playboy Store? Does that seem like advertising to anyone else? Dismas|^(talk) 02:02, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I see where you're coming from, but I guess the most reliable source is on the store's website. Ohyeahmormons 19:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Source for what? Are you thinking in terms of using it as a reference? Dismas|^(talk) 02:16, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes. I think that because it's the official store of Playboy, it makes all the information reliable. Ohyeahmormons 19:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

If we're using it as a reference, shouldn't it be in a references section then? Granted, I don't want a huge list of references, one line for each month, at the bottom of the list, but one blanket statement would be fine with me. That would tone down the advertising feel. Dismas|^(talk) 19:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 20 questions

I added a 20 questions section with all the subjects in it, because if we can have an interview column, why not a 20q one? Ohyeahmormons 19:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)