Talk:List of minor Star Wars droids

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-02-08. The result of the discussion was No consensus.
List of minor Star Wars droids is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, an attempt to standardise coverage of Robotics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
List This article has been rated as list-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Film Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
List
This article has been rated as List-Class on the quality scale.
NA
This article has been rated as NA-importance on the priority scale.
Star Wars Portal
This article is part of WikiProject Star Wars, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. To participate, you can improve this article or visit the project page for more information.
List This article has been rated as list-Class on the quality scale.
This article may be too long.
Please discuss this issue on the talk page, if necessary split the content into subarticles and keep this article in a summary style.

This is a nice article. I was considering breaking it down like this myself. Hope to see this grow over time. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:50, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Hermione Bagwa

A thing to learn about Wikipedia. Just because an article doesnt exist for a character doesn't mean someone won't fill it out later. Also this character is very obscure, and so she doesn't need her own article, but rather a link to a larger page with a bunch of minor minor characters, and the link simply goes down the page to the spot where her entry is. Works for any character like that. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:42, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gender

Some users have questioned the gender of robots. For reference sake, 2-1B is considered to be male. [1] --Viriditas | Talk 05:19, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

What I think is that there is a sort of generalization. For example C-3PO has a male voice and is generally like one wheras WA-7 obviously has female characteristics.

[edit] Inconsistency

R4-P17 ...During Anakin's hunt for Asajj Ventress, R4-P17 accompanied Skywalker. R4-P17 had its head ripped off by a buzz droid during the Battle of Coruscant in Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith killing her.

Wait a minute. The R4 that accompanied Anakin to Yavin IV got blown up with his ship, so it clearly couldn't have been the same R4 unless he had an incredibly efficient repair kit. I assume the words "killing her" are either an attempt to apply gender to a droid or a misplaced reference to Ventress's (assumed) death. Lee M 01:34, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] IG-88

Shouldn't IG-88 be in this list?

IG-88 has been the subject of enough EU fiction that he warrants his own page, IMO. BinaryTed 19:14, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Note to anyone intending on splitting off a section

This page has been processed by N-Bot, which, for browsing convenience, changes links to redirects to lists to links to the relevant list sections: e.g. [[OOM-9]] is changed to [[Minor droids in Star Wars#OOM-9|OOM-9]].

As a result, anyone who intends to split a section out of this page should be aware that, as of 6 August 2005, the following sections were linked to from the following pages:

~~ N-Bot (t/c) 22:00, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 4-LOM

Why does 4-LOM link here when there isn't any mention of him on the page?Euchrid 04:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

The 4-LOM entry was removed 00:15, 18 December 2005 by 71.131.229.28 without explanation. As there is apparently no other article for 4-LOM and several pages link to it by name, I have readded the section. BinaryTed 19:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merging MK-09

MK-09- Should we? I think we should. --Thefourdotelipsis 07:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Merge. --maru (talk) contribs 20:37, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Moving page

Move to List of minor Star Wars droids for consistency--PatCheng 04:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] OOM-9

For your information, the image you have for OOM-9 is, in fact, not OOM-9, but instead is an image of an unnamed commander droid which Qui-Gon cut in half when he was freeing pilots in the origional escape from Naboo. He may look the same, but there should be plenty of other images you can use that actually are of OOM-9. 192.103.41.201 01:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, it looks like OOM-9 to me, but I've replaced it with Wookieepedia's image anyway. --maru (talk) contribs 01:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "Specific droids rather than droid types"

The introduction to this page clearly states: "It [this page] includes specific droids rather than droid types (such as protocol droids and battle droids for instance.)" Aside from having the period inside the parenthesis and the redundancy of "such as" and "for instance", which I'll fix in a moment, it's blatantly contradicted by the presence of "battle droid" on the list, as well as several other droid types - air battle droid, seeker droid, assassin droid, bio droid, grapple droid, etc. etc. etc. Either the line in the intro or those droid types need to go. Should there be a separate List of minor Star Wars droid types page? Tophtucker 23:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Ultimately, there should be mini sections for droid types on a main Droid (Star Wars) page, and no need for a list of droid types. — Deckiller 01:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Length of article

This article is very long. Longer in fact than some non-fiction, humanities articles on Wikipedia. Can each robot not have its own article?

Perhaps it could be divvied up by droid type, or failing that affiliation (Republic, Empire, Freelance). --Anoma lee 07:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I'm probably nominating this for deletion in a few days

The title of the article itself says it all: this is a list of non-noteable crap, and exists on other wikis already. Jtrainor 16:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

This is one of my favorite articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.57.118.223 (talk) 06:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] R5-D4

I don't know how to add the citation for this, but the bit about R5 D4 being sold to Voreen Naal comes from the West End Games Star Wars RPG sourcebook.

[edit] R4-P17

One could also argue that the droid was not completely destroyed and that Anakin once again repaired R4-P17. All that was seen was the remains of the head-plate fly off. Who's to say that the rest of the body didn't survive? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emperor001 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 24 May 2007

(I moved the preceding text here because discussion doesn't belong in the article.) Pat Berry 17:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] R5-J2

I have removed this section from the article. As it stands, it is completely non-notable; we know very little about it, and what little we do know seems fairly pointless. If there's any story at all that you feel makes it notable...please, let me know.

[edit] R5-J2

Image:R5j2.jpg
R5-J2
Droid type Astromech Droid
Manufacturer Industrial Automaton
Gender
Height 1.4 meters
Sensor color Black
Home planet Death Star II
Master (owner) Unnamed Imperial administrator
Affiliation Empire

R5-J2 was an astromech droid stationed aboard the second Death Star. He met his end when that installation was destroyed in the Battle of Endor.


...makes me shiver, just reading it. David 00:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:4 lom.jpg

Image:4 lom.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:RA-7.jpg

Image:RA-7.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Movie wa7.jpg

Image:Movie wa7.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)