Talk:List of ministers of the environment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources.

Contents

[edit] 2004-02-02.

Where does the date "February 2, 2004" come from? I don't see this in the CIA source. --Wik 23:52, May 17, 2004 (UTC)

On page 3 of the CIA's Chiefs of State & Cabinet Members directory [1] is states "Information received as of 2 February 2004 has been used in preparation of this directory." This is the newest single document I know of with the info. Some of seperate country files were out of date when I started this, tho I see South Africa's been updated since then, and is now correct.
Should we delete the last known date in office and "present", just leave it empty? -- Jeandré, 2004-05-18t12:03z, 2004-05-19t22:26z
Yes, that's better. The CIA does not immediately receive information about all changes, so it's not certain that everyone listed was still in office on February 2. --Wik 22:31, May 19, 2004 (UTC)
Done. -- Jeandré, 2004-05-30t13:19z

[edit] Worst. Formatting. Ever.

This must be one of the worst formatting I ever saw on Wikipedia. Can somebody make the tables more uniform?

Maybe something like this: Minister_of_Finance_(New_Zealand) or Treasurer_of_Australia —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.69.13.58 (talkcontribs) 15:03, 9 August 2006.

Sounds like you have volunteered yourslf for the job! Good luck :) --BrownHairedGirl 15:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
See Cambodia, Cameroon, and Canada for a pretty layout. Being static it removes all the advantages of a liquid design. -- Jeandré, 2007-09-29t09:05z

[edit] Color codes = inaccessible.

This article isn't accessible to visually impaired individuals, whose screen readers will not tell them what text is highlighted. I'd fix it myself, but I have to run. Omphaloscope talk 21:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

The new notes column will be used to indicate Rio and WSSD attendees. -- Jeandré, 2008-01-20t20:58z

[edit] Scotland

Scotland Minister for Environment added but can someone put it in standard format? Too much for me!

Done. -- Jeandré, 2007-08-05t07:58z

[edit] Move back to all years?

The move to 2007 with the removal of the historical information hasn't been followed up. Any objections to taking it back to the "ugly" tables version? -- Jeandré, 2007-08-05t07:58z

Done. -- Jeandré, 2007-09-29t08:44z