Talk:List of film decologies and larger series

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Film Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
List
This article has been rated as List-Class on the quality scale.
NA
This article has been rated as NA-importance on the priority scale.

Contents

[edit] Merger

Merging the List of film series to this list makes sense to me because this list follows the naming conventions of the other film lists, List of film duologies, List of film trilogies, List of film tetralogies and List of film pentalogies. Additionally, once this merger is complete, the List of film series article could serve as a redirect to Film series, which would then serve as an intro for all the lists of film series. — WiseKwai 15:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dodecology=12

I changed the word Dodecology (12-parts) to Icosology (20-parts) as that was what was meant in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skippiikai (talk • contribs) 05:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Page title is still wrong

The title of this page is Hexologies to Dodecologies, or 6 to 12 part films. The article lists series up to icosologies, and then more series up to 60 something parts long. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skippiikai (talk • contribs) 05:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC).

What should the title be then? List of film hexologies to icosologies? Or how about List of film hexologies and larger series? The latter title would capture those series that are greater than 20 parts. — WiseKwai 09:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I was also thinking it would be good to leave it open after hexologies. Unfortunately "polylogy" isn't in the dictionary and its original language meaning is "verbosity". So, List of film hexologies and larger series seems to be the best naming. Please, comment so we can move the article soon. Hoverfish Talk 12:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Pornos?!?!?!?

Are porn series' really necessary in this list? ONEder Boy 01:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Films of any nature are welcome to be on any of these lists. - LA @ 09:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Completion

Are films which have not, and therefore may not, be made really fit for inclusion? Makes such lists speculative at best, reducing their value as an authoritive work. --Falcadore 11:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicates (Almost)

Some series are listed twice (with minor differences in the title). I wonder whether it is necessary, for example, to make a list for Pokémon theatrical releases, and another for all Pokémon movies. The same goes for Godzilla. There is a list for the Soma series and another for all Godzilla movies. Wouldn't one list for each be sufficient? Puceron 01:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

You are right. I'm not familiar with either but I'm willing to wager that most of those films are unrelated to one another other than the name and title character. It's like the Batman films. The live action Batman films are not listed with the animated Batman films because they are different series. Batman Begins, the fifth live action film, is not included with the first four because it does not belong with that series. Are all the Godzilla films a sequel from one to another to another and so forth? I highly doubt it. --Bardin (talk) 08:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)