Talk:List of enemies in Doom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Mid | This article is on a subject of mid priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 November 2007 (UTC). The result of the discussion was delete. |
[edit] G4
- Recreation of deleted material. A copy, by any title, of a page deleted via a deletion discussion, provided the copy is substantially identical to the deleted version and that any changes in the recreated page do not address the reasons for which the material was deleted. This does not apply to content that has been moved to user space, undeleted via deletion review, deleted via proposed deletion, or to speedy deletions (although in that case, the previous speedy criterion, or other speedy criteria, may apply).
This version is not an identical copy and does seem to address the problems that plagued the original – which was, namely, a lack of third party sources. I'm also divided by the fact that you should usually go through WP:DRV before recreating an article...so...I leave that up to the next admin. hbdragon88 (talk) 01:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Trying to AFD but it brings up the old delete vote, and the instructions here are not perfectly clear on how to deal with that. Wanting to nom for delete as fan cruft. Help would be appreciated. Pharmboy (talk) 01:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
-
- Rm afd tags per hbdragon88 for now. Pharmboy (talk) 01:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- This is not fancruft, which is a subjective term and should not be used. The sources in this article show that it is notable. The enemies have considerable criticism for their satanic imagery (it's discussed on CNN's website, yeah, what fancruft!), and their design has been a focus of video game reviews. There is also considerable information on their development. This is all written about, but no where near to its potential. It took about 2 minutes to find this information. All concerns in the AfD have been addressed. --Teggles (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
