From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects.
Click [show] for further details |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, which collaborates on articles related to energy. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received an importance rating within energy. |
|
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
.gif/75px-Rotating_earth_(large).gif) |
This article is supported by the Geography WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage on Geography and related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article Geography, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
|
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. |
|
[edit] Disputed
Data from list and figure disagree completely. E.g. southern Europe is shown very energy efficient in list, but very energy inefficient in figure. South Asia, the opposite... Causantin (talk) 11:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- There are some disagreements for a few countries, but most of them match the table roughly. The picture comes from a different source than the table. The problem is that the picture author has failed to mention his/her sources. For instance, he might be using GPD (exchange rate), while the table uses GPD (PPP). There can be big differences between the two. I will remove the picture. The World Resources Institute is cited as a source. The table is NOT factually inaccurate, since all of it is verifiable. --Cambrasa confab 15:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
