Talk:List of collaborative software

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 26 November 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

There already is list of wiki software and it is long. I don't think it is worthwhile to list wikis here again. -Hapsiainen 12:53, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)

I think I agree. Perhaps we could just link to the List of wiki software from this article in the appropriate spot and remove those particular links? — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work 13:13, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Done. -Hapsiainen 14:49, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)

Since when is Interwoven free or open source? (under product list for web based solutions). -Mimi 12:49, Dec 20, 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Gobby

I think Gobby deserves mention here, although I'm not sure which section it would go in. I haven't really seen anything else like it. 66.20.189.94 16:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

I think Joomla! might also fit in here. Oberiko 12:14, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Redundant links

Some links are redundant, I think it's good enough to have one project listed one time.

Did some cleanup, hope it was not too bold. - 83.254.215.231 (talk) 17:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sort Projects alphabetically

Projects are not sorted alphabetically, sorting makes reading better.

[edit] New software

Can i add new software to this list?

more details about the software can be found at http://www.collaber.com

Our software is as powerfull as Microsoft Groove.. So we think it must be included in the list.

Thanks Rajesh

[edit] Incorrect placement of some items

How can Microsoft Office Groove be Open Source / Free Software? In the corresponding article, it says it is proprietary. (Of course, I didn't even need to read the article to tell you that.)FSHero 16:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Open-Source's Top Billing

Why is open source software in its own category here, and one that dominates the list? Wouldn't it make more sense to organize it by functional domain, collaborative capabilities (Email/IM groupware vs. data visualization vs. screen sharing), or some other logical categorization? Categorizing by license type seems unhelpful. Sam 06:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MessagingMatrix

MessagingMatrix.com provides a much better (dynamic) grid comparison of messaging collaborative software, possibly provided certain titles & and a few attributes were added. It allows one to dynamically "Compare Microsoft Exchange, CommuniGate Pro, Novell Groupwise, Google Mail, and more here." says parent site CompareStuff.Net; and it includes Citadel/UX. So, folks, kindly add there the missing titles (as Group-Office & eGroupWare) and eventually move to there (for messaging) all the above comparison tables. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MBParker (talk • contribs)

[edit] Linkspam

The article is slowly accumulating linkspam again. Please see WP:EL, WP:SPAM, WP:NOT#LINK concerning the proper use of external links. --Ronz 16:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

I've removed the links. --Ronz 17:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Inclusion criteria

The article needs some inclusion criteria for the entries, per WP:LIST. We can start by only listing collaborative software that already has their own articles. --Ronz (talk) 16:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Done, let's see how long it lasts. :) - 83.254.215.231 (talk) 03:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)