From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America |
|
This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, Inuit, Métis and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
??? |
This article has not yet been rated on the assessment scale. |
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- Before assessing this article, be sure to check the existing Archive of assessments made under the previous system (used until July 2006), and feel free to help in migrating the existing comments besides from adding your own evaluation.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
Please rate this article and leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
|
(Moved from Potlatch Bibliography
[edit] Probably needs title change
The title of this should probably be List of bibliographical materials on the potlatch, with the rider that "potlatch" in that title might be capitalizable in a contextual sense, but "the Potlatch" has never been capitalized in that way; the defininite article ("the") is needed, as without it the context would be "....materials on potlatching"; and while potlatching refers to the activity of the potlatch, it doesn't encompass the whole of the potlatch culture. It's not those components of the title that are troubling wiki-wise, though; bibliographies aren't usually article material, unless presented as a list, hence the suggested title change, or to a yet-more-appropriate title that I don't know the naming conventions well enough to propose properly.Skookum1 20:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)