Talk:List of Transformers TV series
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
An appropriate infobox needs to be added to this article, or the current infobox needs to be updated. |
[edit] Character names
"Names for characters were often different between the Japanse release and the Western release. For example, Optimus Prime is called Convoy in Japan. This is why you will often see different names referring to the same character/planet/race etc." I'm not quite sure about it. It seems to me that Convoy and Optimus Prime were different characters...
"Megatron is now a tank, due to some Toy marketing laws. This trend will stay. "
-- what was he before? i'd like more of an explanation about these laws, too.
- He was originally a realistic looking handgun. But in this day and age there has been an outcry against realistic guns (they can be confused for the real thing) and there are some laws against them. So he became a tank instead. Timrollpickering 18:02, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Convoy and Optimus Prime are the same character, like it says. you might be thinking of Ginrai--24.222.239.180 19:18, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Carbombya
Hi, could somoeone familiar with the transformers universe categories this article Carbombya, thanks --nixie 01:49, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Comics
The first subsection of the "comics" section is hopelessly mistitled. It gives the impression that the original G1 series only had 4 issues (as it was planned to). Only by reading the end of the last sentence of the last paragraph will you ever know that 95% of the comic even existed. The section should be rewritten to better reflect the plot of the rest of the comics. — JIP | Talk 17:38, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I've now edited it to mention the rest of the series too, but it's still a stub. — JIP | Talk 04:14, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Check validity of edits by vandal
Could someone check the edits made by User:209.135.123.8 [1] and revert if appropriate. –MT 18:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
There is some validity to adding Canada, as the show was made in Canada, but it was made for showing in North America and Europe. However, since it was licenced by an American company, it can be presumed the series was made for American audiances. I went ahead and changed it back, as well as changing references to the non-japanese series to "Western", as they were shown in the US, Canada, and Europe. –FortMaxT 19:12, 11 November 2005 (CST)
[edit] Original Transformers
Is it just me, or are there articles on every series of Transformers except for the first one? I'm sure I must have just missed it somehow ... - 211.28.82.103 07:44, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
I've changed the word 'races' to 'factions' in the description of the first season of Transformers. In TF:TM the narrator refers to ALL Transformers when he calls them "a unique race of transforming robots." I think it is more accurate to refer to Autobots and Decepticons as subgroups akin political groups or even nationalities within the Transformer race. - CPM
- Transformers should be on "The List of Shows That Suck" --66.218.28.217 05:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
I have to agree. --Yancyfry jr 22:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Article Separation?
I was wondering if you guys thought about splitting the different shows in to different articles. Which in turn would make it a lot smaller, and easier to navigate. Say G1 has its own article as well as the rest though, I noticed Beast Wars has its own already, then have this article as a general one that gives a less detailed overview of everything. Or things that do not fit in any of the show articles. This way also we can add more information and pictures with out having this particular main overview article go over its max amount of space. It is sort of like this, you would not have each individual character from one of the series have a full length biography on the main article of the show when you could just make a separate article for that particular character. I just wanted to ask what you guys thought before I, or if someone else wants to help, to start separating the main article's show information. Alus 23:33, 1 December, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Article Merger
I agree with Alus. Either a merger or a seperation may be required. It seems that much of the information on this page is duplicated on the Transformers series page -- so much so that they appear to be almost the same article. Perhaps we should either merge the two (along with perhaps the Transformers Comic page) or differentiate more between them. For instance, the Transformers Universe page seems to be overly focused on the Television Series relative to the comic storyline.
Perhaps the Marvel Comics relative to the Marvel Comics Universe page is a more helpful guide to give a distinction?
[edit] Article Merger
I agree with Alus. I think that there should still be a list but with each of the series having there own seperate pages so that it doesn't have to be so much information lsited but be much clearer on seperate pages. All the information on TRANSFORMER SERIES should be placed on TRANSFORMER UNIVERSES as seperate section but without the descriptions of all the various series. The only problem with doing this might generate lots of stubs though????
- Togts: 2006 Jan 9 16:22 (UTC)
[edit] Merger
Given that there are separate articles for Transformers (comics) and Transformers (toyline), how about renaming Transformers series as Transformers (cartoons) and using Transformers universes as a shortened index, merging any extra info it currently contains into the other three?
Although actually looking at those articles, the toylines one only goes up to RID, and only directly includes American toylines. At the moment, the sum of content across articles (and its layout) is significantly less useful than a decent fansite or set of links. Rather than attempt to classify everything Transformers, a 'by-year' approach may be less liable to leave sections with misleading gaps.
Denyer 23:18, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] On the Merger
Of corse, the problem in going by years that release years weren't the same in all markets. For instance, the US 1989 Micromasters were released in 1990 in Japan, but we could just use the Western release year as the orginization, and when the Japanese releases differ, for instance, in the 1990 sub-catagory, state that the 1989 micromasters were released in Japan, with a link to the 1989 sub-cat FortMax 20:0, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Organisation of index
This would be a main index page -- rather than sublink, you'd have a timeline pointing to main articles.
So, the timeline would include:
1984
'The Transformers' season one begins --> "The Transformers (animated series)" (US/Europe)
'Fight Super Robot Life' season one begins --> "The Transformers (animated series)" (Japan)
'The Transformers' first issue published --> "The Transformers (Marvel comic)" (US/Japan/Europe)
...
1987
'Transformers 2010' begins --> "The Transformers (animated series)" (Japan)
...
2005
'Galaxy Force' begins --> "Transformers: Galaxy Force (animated series)" (Japan)
'Cybertron' begins --> "Transformers: Cybertron (animated series)" (US)
'Beast Wars Returns' begins --> "Transformers: Beast Machines (animated series)" (Japan)
To my mind, that's the clearest way of making sure all content is accessible.
Denyer 08:13, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re-Organisation of index
'Fight! Super Robot Lifeform Transformers' (both the show and the toys) weren't out in Japan until 1985, which saw the release of the '84 and '85 US releases.
FortMax 01:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SciFi Channel airing
I'm curious concerning when aired and which part of the series aired on Sci Fi as I have recently created the "Cartoon Quest" article that focuses on the block programming of animated shows in 1992-1995 that included the show in its line-up. DrWho42 01:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Found on Frenzy transformers, which used to, and now again, redirects here
Generation 1
In Transformers, frenzy like all of the transformers crashed landed on earth in the autobot ship the ark, After being awakenened a volcanic eruption frenzy and the other decepticons were rebuilt by teletrann 1. As soundwave is rumble, frenzy, laserbeak, buzzsaw and ravage's guardian, when soundwave was rebuilt as a tape player frenzy and his brothers where rebuilt as tapes which soundwave can activate at will. frenzy was the lesser known of the tapes, appearing now and then in certain scrennshots.
Personality
frenzy like his brother rumble is a meglomaniac that loves the sight of destruction and craves battle. frenzy, again like his brother lack intelligence and tend to point out the obvious, however due to these flaws they are loyal to soundwave and especially megatron.
marvel comics In the comic book series of transformers, frenzy is nearly destroyed by the newly built omega supreme and placed in cold storeage by rachet with thundercracker and a number of other decepticons.
target:2006
In target 2006 frenzy is reawakened in the ark with thundercracker, they both escape to the decepticon base where thay find a confused shockwave. but the three are displaced when hot rod, blurr and kup arrive from future.
g.i joe vs transformers
In g.i joe vs the transformers rumble is reprogramed to obey the pilot of soundwave. When the arms dealer destro purchases soundwave and the tape cassets ,he attacks a goverment research facility. Frenzy is shot through the head by the joe, sci-fi who along with the other joe's abushes destro. but despite they're efforts destro gets away withthe sps information.
Transformers: the movie
frenzy is breifly seen as the decepticons attack autobot city, as he is sent to desroy the autobot's conmunications equipment.
[edit] Title?
Should the title not be Transformers (series), in line with other articles and the manual of style?
EvocativeIntrigue TALK | EMAIL 20:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Headmasters split
Headmasters definitely needs it's own article (something I've been looong meaning to do but just... never have...) but that doesn't mean that it's entry on this page needs to be taken away. - Chris McFeely 22:28, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
I agree! SSJ 5 12:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] American or Japanese?
I know that Transformers has american and japanese versions but which one was first? And please answer if you actually KNOW the answer and are not playing favorites between the two. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.160.239.46 (talk) 15:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC).
Transformers was originally an American creation to rebrand and market toys from several Japanese toy lines, Diaclone and Microman Microchange being the most important. The characters, concepts, and packaging were all created by Americans (Jim Shooter and Denny O'Neil came up with most of the concepts, Bob Budiansky (http://transfans.net/interviews_budiansky.php) wrote almost all of the tech specs for the original G1 toy series and came up with the majority of the characters, Floro Dery designed the cartoon versions of most of the characters with a little help from Japan(http://hometown.aol.com/kuest144/ and http://members.aol.com/tfencyc/interview_dery.html), and the various writers for the original cartoon were all freelancers or part of the Marvel Studios/Sunbow stable and worked in all kinds of American cartoons (Flint Dille also did GI Joe, David Wise also did TMNT, et cetera, see IMDB)). The show and American restyling of the action figures and subsequent original toys were exported back to Japan (and other countries) as Transformers a little bit later. Transformers is not anime.
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:A2597-210.jpg
I found Image:A2597-210.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:A2597-210.jpg
Image:A2597-210.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] What if animated series was acknowledged in sequel?
If in the upcoming sequel(s) the animated series is revealed to have been based on the lives of the characters in the live action film would the community accept this or completely reject this idea?
For example, a scene would reveal Sam watching an episode of the animated series complaining of how his name was changed to Spike, or perhaps he comments on how they made Optimus Prime and bumblebee look too “cartoonish”, and how the writers of the animated series changed Megatron’s alternate appearance to a handgun rather than a Cybertronian jet because focus groups found the latter to be unappealing to children.
Would this be seen as an easy escape for the production staff and crucified? Or, perhaps, could the community accept this explanation of the differences between the two? --UseLongRangeSight 23:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Convoys.jpg
Image:Convoys.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
