Talk:List of Total Nonstop Action Wrestling alumni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Professional wrestling List of Total Nonstop Action Wrestling alumni is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] design

Why isn't this page built the same as it's WWE couterpart?--Yugioh73036 01:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Yugioh73036 I've started to convert it, I have the 2002 and 2003 alumni. If somebody could possibly help that would be awesome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.141.147.89 (talk) 04:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Release notes

saying a wrestler either returned to a different company or signed with a different company is fine, you shouldnt put later accomplishments on the release notes... i have made a few changes please dont change them back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.117.52.18 (talk) 21:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jeff Hardy

Since he's back in WWE, isn't he a TNA alumni?--Yugioh73036 14:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Yugioh73036

[edit] Monty Brown

When was he released?Freebird Jackson 03:26, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I just checked the tnawrestlng.com roster page and he is still on there.Freebird Jackson 03:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Senshi?

Why isn't he amongst the Alumni? Vinyldestination (talk) 15:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

BECAUSE HE HASN'T LEFT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Guns2006 (talk) 15:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Christopher Daniels

It's a story line that he' sbeen fired. Guns2006 (talk) 14:14, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Vince Russo?

I'd love to believe he's an alumnist now, but I don't think it's true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zack Shadow (talkcontribs) 04:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] setting

i think someone needs to change the 2002, 2003, and 2004 sections to the same look as the rest of the years, because i think it looks better and would be more efficient. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaylethal2008 (talkcontribs) 08:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)