Talk:List of State Routes in Connecticut

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics Connecticut Routes
List This article has been rated as List-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Top This article has been rated as top-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject Connecticut
 This article is part of WikiProject Connecticut, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Connecticut, United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll/Part2

This state's highway naming convention is up for debate above. Feel free to participate. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Creating pages for minor routes

I tried to create a page for Route 19, but am having trouble getting around the redirects to List of minor state routes in Connecticut. Any suggestions? Dan ad nauseam 21:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Rt. 19 is a really minor route, which is why it is redirected to the minor routes list. But if you feel it deserves its own article, you can simply replace the redirect text with what you want to put in. You can go directly to the article here --Polaron | Talk 21:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "rv unnecessary bypassing of redirects"

Why is that unnecessary? If the name of the page is Connecticut Route 68, why should the list point to Route 68 (Connecticut), which just redirects to Connecticut Route 68? Drjayphd (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

See WP:R2D and WP:USSH. The redirects are not broken. There is no need to change them. --Polaron | Talk 01:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Fair enough, it just strikes me as odd that the policy is to revert it and point at the redirects, rather than "eh, either the direct link or the redirect's fine". Drjayphd (talk) 19:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)