Talk:List of S&P 500 companies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Naming convention for Companies and Businesses
I just wanted to draw attention and comment to on a draft poll to determine naming convention for companies and businesses. I have looked around a number of places and have only seen comments to the effect of "we should have a convention" or "do we have a convention" on how to name a XXX company. This has either the effect of drawing a few uninterested comments or a stirring up a heated debate. In either case the net result is generally zero. Your comments to help clarify this poll and later corresponding vote would be greatly appreciated. --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 17:58, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies)/poll
Voting has begun and will continue until March 5. Please resolve this lagging issue. --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 22:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please do not edit text of listing.
Please do not edit the text of the listing. This is the list as it comes from S&P. Please make redirects for companies better known by other names instead of editing their listing. This enables easier updates from the S&P list. Thanks. --ChrisRuvolo 00:49, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The listing includes "Phelps Dodge" which is not a component of the S&P per the newest list. Looking on the list and it was one of the additions and subtractions to the list. Just eyeballing the list, it looks like there have been 20 or so deletions and additions since the list was last updated (see http://www2.standardandpoors.com/portal/site/sp/en/us/page.topic/indices_500/2,3,2,2,0,2,4,2007,0,3,1,0,1,50,0,0.html .
Would simply linking to the S&P's resource be better? It seems like the list of companies in the S&P changes each month, so someone would need to update the list on a monthly basis if we want it to be accurate.
Trompelamort (talk) 13:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Updating category
There is also a category (Category:S&P 500). Is there any desire to keep that synced with this list? -- Bovineone 06:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Current list of missing articles for S&P 500 companies
Updated 6 March 2007:
Company | Ticker symbol | SEC filings | Industry |
---|---|---|---|
Applera Corp-Applied Biosystems Group | ABI | reports | Life Sciences Tools & Services |
Archstone-Smith Trust | ASN | reports | Residential REITs |
BJ Services | BJS | reports | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
Bard (C.R.) Inc. | BCR | reports | Health Care Equipment |
Century Telephone | CTL | reports | Integrated Telecommunication Services |
Equity Residential | EQR | reports | Residential REITs |
Hudson City Bancorp | HCBK | reports | Thrifts & Mortgage Finance |
Kimco Realty | KIM | reports | Retail REITs |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holding | LH | reports | Health Care Services |
Millipore Corp. | MIL | reports | Life Sciences Tools & Services |
Noble Corporation | NE | reports | Oil & Gas Drilling |
Pinnacle West Capital | PNW | reports | Electric Utilities |
Questar Corp. | STR | reports | Gas Utilities |
Spectra Energy Corp. | SE | reports | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
Zions Bancorp | ZION | reports | Regional Banks |
- ^ Standard & Poor - Indices S&P 500 (Excel). Standard & Poor's (2007-03-01). Retrieved on 2007-03-04.
--A. B. (talk) 15:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 5 March 2007 changes + issues to consider
Yesterday, I replaced the existing list with the 1 March 2007 list of S&P 500 constituents from the Standard and Poor's website. While I was at it, I also added ticker symbols, each company's industry (as listed by S&P) and links to each company's filings at www.sec.gov. I created new redirects for companies whose article names did not match the names S&P used. I also made sure each company was listed in Category:S&P 500.
The convention observed previously with this article has been to use exactly the S&P nomenclature, which I have done, however I think we may want to rethink a few:
- Companies with "(New)" in their listing such as Fluor Corp. (New)
- Companies with a specific class of stock in their listing such as Dynegy Inc. (New) Class A and Scripps (E. W.) 'A'
- S&P's list is more precisely a list of equity securities, while this list is of companies
Perhaps these types of situations might be best handled with footnotes, for example:
- Fluor Corp.[1]
- 1 Fluor Corporation was listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:FLR) in 1957 and later acquired. In 2000, Fluor was spun out of Massey Energy and the "new" Fluor Corporation was relisted on the NYSE.
- Scripps (E. W.)[2]
- 2 Scripps has two classes of common stock, "Voting shares" and "Class A". Class A shares are used in S&P 500 index calculations
What do others think? (And does anyone have any problems with the expanded information I added yesterday?) --A. B. (talk) 16:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- In the past, I had truncated the "(New)" where it was listed. I also removed the "class A" where I was able to find it. The footnotes would be fine with me, but may be hard to maintain as the S&P list gets updated in the future. I don't see anything wrong with the expanded info, the update looks good to me. Thanks for your work. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Every month there are major corporate actions (e.g. Mergers and Acquisitions) that change the composition of the S&P. While admirable, I think the footnotes would be A. Hard to maintain and B. crowd out the list after a year. Trompelamort (talk) 13:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] it would be helpful to have
a summary count of components by sector (i.e. financials, vs industrials etc)