Talk:List of Pokémon (461-480)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] better how to catch info (rotom)
i beleive there should be more info on how to catch rotom. i am currently playing this game but cannot find rotom and i do not know exactly what tasks i have to do before catching it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by M877y (talk • contribs).
- Wikipedia is not a game guide, so we removed gameplay information. A suitable place to look for that would be Bulbapedia or Gamefaqs. -WarthogDemon 20:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- I concur that Gamefaqs would be much better. Or Serebii.net. However, Rotom is found in the Old Chateau in the TV at night. It's near the exit to Eterna Forest. I think you have to beat a certain number of gyms to get it.--Zxcvbnm 02:53, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- You have to have the National Pokédex in order to get it--you earn that by seeing all 150 Sinnoh Pokédex Pokémon (it's possible to do this going through the game without trading) and beating the Elite Four and Champion. Ron Stoppable —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 21:14, August 22, 2007 (UTC).
- I concur that Gamefaqs would be much better. Or Serebii.net. However, Rotom is found in the Old Chateau in the TV at night. It's near the exit to Eterna Forest. I think you have to beat a certain number of gyms to get it.--Zxcvbnm 02:53, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Porygon-Z
Do we really need the Special Attack info? Wikipedia is not a game guide, so why would this be needed? TheBlazikenMaster 23:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, it might be fine, but if you see stuff like individual numbers or tips, just delete it. It's supposed to be in Bulbapedia, not here.--ZXCVBNM 01:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Why does it have to be at another website? Can it not be here as well, seeing that this is Wikipedia? MiracleMatter 19:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, if it has the highest Special Attack its fine, because certianly that makes it special. But normally, stuff like that would fall under game guide material, which is something Wikipedia is generally not supposed to provide. Ageofe 00:52, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- Why does it have to be at another website? Can it not be here as well, seeing that this is Wikipedia? MiracleMatter 19:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] pictures
could we have pics of the pokemon?81.108.233.59 18:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunatly, Wikipedia won't allow us to have individual pictures, and we really arn't supposed to have any if they don't have a free license on them. We used to- if your looking for pictures, you could always check Bulbapedia or pe2k.com Ageofe 18:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] no spoiler!
Ach there doesnt seem to be any spoiler alert on parts of teh article. I was looking up dusknoir, and now it ruined the game for me T_T 72.138.255.173 (talk) 16:36, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- That's not our problem. When you come to Wikipeida you should expect to see spoilers. Take caution when you read next time. -Sukecchi (talk) 16:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well that's not very nice Sukecchi. The spoiler comes very unexpected. Perhaps we could reword that paragraph somehow? Cheers, Face 17:01, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Don't make me look like the bad guy. I'm only saying what has been said before. When you come to a site like Wikipedia you should expect to see spoilers. -Sukecchi (talk) 17:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Nobody was assuming you're the villain here. But I agree that it spoilers should be expected, I still think it sucks for the IP to being spoiled unexpectedly. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 22:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Don't make me look like the bad guy. I'm only saying what has been said before. When you come to a site like Wikipedia you should expect to see spoilers. -Sukecchi (talk) 17:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- It clearly says In Pokemon Mysterious Dungeon 2.... When you see that and you're playing the game; that's when you need to stop reading. -Sukecchi (talk) 23:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well that's not very nice Sukecchi. The spoiler comes very unexpected. Perhaps we could reword that paragraph somehow? Cheers, Face 17:01, 26 April 2008 (UTC)