Talk:List of One Piece chapters

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.

Contents

[edit] Re-design

I just thought that in order to raise the article on the assesment scale, we could arreange it the same as List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes, which is a Featured article. The table is basiclly the same, except for the air date (since it wasn't aired). I'm going to try and make an article with that idea in mind on my sandbox (create.. all I have to do is insert the info). Opinions? Kurigiri 19:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Okay, forget I even said anything. Kurigiri 20:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chapter 437

WAS this chapter already published,or not? New Babylon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by New Babylon (talk • contribs) 13:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

Information on the chapter typically is revealed by subscribers as soon as they receive it, which tends to be the week before the magazine goes on sale at newsstands. So even though it isn't "officially" out according to its street date, it's still out there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Julian Grybowski (talk • contribs) 14:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] 441. Darkness!

I asked something similar before,but is this a subscribers info or not?Looked on One Piece Manga Online version 2 & 3 ,plus done a general search on Google for "One Piece Chapter 441" and it didnt spit out anything.

New Babylon 15:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No Chapters this week

For those of you who dont know,its golden week in Japan,so there will be no One Piece chapters-just to avoid fake "chapters" sneaking in like it hapened with "441. Darkness!".

New Babylon 20:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re-design (part 2)

Maybe it should be done in the same way as List of Naruto Chapters. Its much easier to understand it and it has the cover of the volumes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.13.23 (talk • contribs)

So, something like this?
Cover Title Volume Release date
English Japanese Japan US
Image:One Piece vol01.jpg Romance Dawn ROMANCE DAWN —冒険の夜明け— 1 24 December 1997 June 2003
Chapters
  • 001. Romance Dawn (ROMANCE DAWN —冒険の夜明け— Romance Dawn: Bōken no Yoake?, lit. "Romance Dawn: Dawn of Adventure")
  • 002. They Call Him "Straw Hat Luffy" (その男「麦わらのルフィ」 Sono Otoko "Mugiwara no Rufi"?, lit. "That Man, 'Straw Hat Luffy'")
  • 003. Enter Zolo: Pirate Hunter (海賊狩りロロノア・ゾロ」登場 "Kaizoku-Gari Roronoa Zoro" Tōjō?)
  • 004. The Great Captain Morgan (海軍大佐「斧手のモーガン」 Kaigun Taisa "Onote no Mōgan"?, lit. "Navy Captain 'Axe-Hand Morgan'")
  • 005. The King of the Pirates and the Master Swordsman (海賊王と大剣豪 Kaizoku Ō to Daikengō?)
  • 006. Number One (一人目 Hitorime?, lit. "The First Person")
  • 007. Friends (友達 Tomodachi?)
  • 008. Nami (ナミ登場 Nami Tōjō?, lit. "Enter Nami")
ISBN
Cover character(s)
The only problem I can foresee is that, as with the template for anime episodes, the images might be judged unnecessary and eliminated from the format altogether. —Julian Grybowski 22:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes This is exactly what I meant. I think that this format if more creative and seems better.68.206.73.46 18:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use image removal

I have removed all or a majority of the fair use images on this page as their use was not in line with our Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria policy (likely in that the use is not minimal (3.a.) and it is in a list or a gallery (8.)) or our Wikipedia:Non-free content guideline that states that cover images may only be used for critical commentary on the cover itself, not just identification. Please do not re-add them without discussion. Kotepho 09:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I think that a page of information of volumes where it is explained what characters are in the cover is really stupid (sorry). The info that people are searching is the cover itself, and it may be a photo, but it is info. The fact to not show the photo of the cover makes the page non enough informative, and people will use other pages instead of wiki to get the info. I will understand what you say in a book... but in a comic, the cover is very important, and it is visible to all the public. Anonym 05:11 29 June 2007 (+1:00)

[edit] Blah tags

If no one else is working on adding the required references (sources for ISBN I'm assuming), I'll begin working on it tomorrow. This is one of the few OP articles I feel is necessary on Wikipedia. Ark (talk) 19:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

The main thing needing sourcing are the prose sections. See some of the FL chapter lists for what the lead should contain, and what needs sourcing. For the table itself, I've fixed the ELs to put them properly as general references. They have the ISBNs and release dates for the individual Japanese volumes. Viz's page, however, does not have release dates, so individual references are needed for all of those. Also all the prose in the uncollected chapters section. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and done the intro rewrite, and axed out the prose in the uncollected chapters (OR/PO that doesn't belong anyway). If you'd like to work on adding refs for statements in the intro, that'd be cool, and for the individual English release dates, that would be cool. If not, I'll work on the lead refs later today. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Viz gives release dates for all but the first four volumes. A trip to Amazon should fill that gap. ~SnapperTo 20:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Ah, good to know! I just checked the first volume. :P -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Chapter 502

Hey, I have a problem with the portion of the translation of the Chapter 502 title of 天竜人 as "Celestial Dragon". By translating it as such, I believe it does not take into account the 人 aspect of the group of kanji, which qualifies it as a person. Anyone reading this title would assume that it is actually referring to a "dragon." I believe it should be left intact as an untranslatable "Tenryuubito," or changed to something altogether different. Any suggestions or comments? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Captainjustin (talk • contribs) 20:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)