Talk:List of NLP-related articles
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] External Link Spamming
I put a speedy delete tag on some "contributions" by User:63.199.31.178. Some or all of these new articles were linked back to this page, and their sole content were external links to nlpschedule.com. Lists of external links are not appropriate in Wikipedia.
12:13, Mar 28, 2005 (hist) (diff) Future Pacing
12:11, Mar 28, 2005 (hist) (diff) Transderivational Search
12:10, Mar 28, 2005 (hist) (diff) Context Reframing
12:10, Mar 28, 2005 (hist) (diff) T.O.T.E.
12:10, Mar 28, 2005 (hist) (diff) Future Pacing
12:09, Mar 28, 2005 (hist) (diff) Four Tuple
12:08, Mar 28, 2005 (hist) (diff) Representational System Primacy
12:07, Mar 28, 2005 (hist) (diff) Representational Systems
The following pages were existing pages that were also spammed with these seemingly self-promotion external links by User:63.199.31.178 and User:69.109.178.79. I leave it up to the the legitimate contributors of these pages to judge whether those external links are useful:
23:20, Mar 27, 2005 (hist) (diff) Reframing (top)
23:20, Mar 27, 2005 (hist) (diff) Human Potential Movement
23:18, Mar 27, 2005 (hist) (diff) Self-help (top)
23:13, Mar 27, 2005 (hist) (diff) NLP modalities (top)
23:12, Mar 27, 2005 (hist) (diff) Neurological levels (top)
23:11, Mar 27, 2005 (hist) (diff) Meta program (top)
23:10, Mar 27, 2005 (hist) (diff) Milton Model (top)
23:09, Mar 27, 2005 (hist) (diff) Rapport (top)
23:09, Mar 27, 2005 (hist) (diff) Metamodel (top)
23:07, Mar 27, 2005 (hist) (diff) Anchoring (top)
21:45, Mar 25, 2005 (hist) (diff) Category:NLP
21:44, Mar 25, 2005 (hist) (diff) NLP map
21:44, Mar 25, 2005 (hist) (diff) List of NLP topics
21:41, Mar 25, 2005 (hist) (diff) Neuro-linguistic programming
20:36, Mar 25, 2005 (hist) (diff) Robert Dilts
20:34, Mar 25, 2005 (hist) (diff) Richard Bandler
20:31, Mar 25, 2005 (hist) (diff) Body language
20:28, Mar 25, 2005 (hist) (diff) Milton Model
--JimCollaborator 20:59, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
- The pages speedily deleted would be valid articles if the contributor had added any text to explain them. :ChrisG 11:14, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Layout
Is this supposed to be sorted alphabetically or by category? It seems to be some as one and some as the other currently. RJFJR (talk) 16:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)