Talk:List of NESTS agents
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Separate from list of characters?
I'm slightly confused as to why these characters are separated from the main list of characters. I understand for the EX and MI characters, but not for Nests. Is it because they are characters mostly in one or two games? Also, for as much as I like Diana, I don't think she deserves her own section per say as she hasn't been playable yet. Until she is, I think it would be better to put her together with Kula. Sake neko (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- The reason I'm splitting those articles is because the current list ends up weighing in at a hefty 149kb even now, because some guy went and merged almost *all* the KOF character articles into it @_@ While I agree not everyone really deserves an article of their own that page is just too huge. Either it'll end up chopped up or you'll end up with info removed and reduced.
- Oh and agreed about Diana. I didn't add that section to the page, it was there already actually.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
What i don`t get is why the hell article is called "list of NESTS agents". Why not "NESTS chronicles characters"? As now it stands it seems that it`ll cover only agents from NESTS, while for example such characters as BAO or May Lee were never NESTS agents but they were created and were playable during NESTS chronicles. So someone will have to create another article called "List of non-agents from NESTS chronicles"? I would suggest deleting this article and recreating it as a list for all new characters from this epizode. --BlisterD (talk) 11:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Actually anyone that isn't listed here and was created during the NESTS saga still ends up appearing in later games with a few exceptions. Listing those guys here would be a waste of time as this is covering the one specific group. It's like the fact that the Orochi saga listing doesn't include everyone introduced there because not all of them were involved directly, but that's another story anyway.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- So what will you do with those exceptions? Ignore them? Create another list of characters? Line must be drawn somewhere.--BlisterD (talk) 20:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Leave them in the main list for now, expand the articles that can be expanded into individual articles and carry on from there. Simple enough.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- So what will you do with those exceptions? Ignore them? Create another list of characters? Line must be drawn somewhere.--BlisterD (talk) 20:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AngelKOF2002.png
Image:AngelKOF2002.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:K9999KOF2003.jpg
Image:K9999KOF2003.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)